Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Lindemann and Grüneisen Laws

Open access
Gilvarry, J. J.·1956·Physical Review

Abstract

The Lindemann assumption of direct contact of neighboring atoms at fusion is replaced by the criterion that melting occurs when the root-mean-square amplitude of thermal vibration reaches a critical fraction $\ensuremath{\rho}$, presumed the same for all isotropic monatomic solids, of the distance of separation of nearest-neighbor atoms. The Debye-Waller theory of the temperature dependence of the intensity of Bragg reflection of x-rays is used, without further assumptions, to derive a generalized Lindemann law. In contrast to the Lindemann form, all physical quantities involved in this formulation are evaluated at the fusion point, and departure of the average energy of an atomic oscillation from the equipartition value is taken into account by the quantization factor of the Debye-Waller theory. If the Gr\"uneisen constant ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{m}$ of the solid at fusion is evaluated by its definition from the Debye frequency of the solid, use of the generalized Lindemann law and Clapeyron's equation permits one to express ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{m}$ in terms of the bulk modulus of the solid at melting and the latent heat and volume change of fusion. By means of Gr\"uneisen's law applied to the solid at fusion, ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{m}$ can be expressed likewise in terms of the corresponding bulk modulus, thermal expansion, volume, and heat capacity at constant volume; the two evaluations of ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{m}$ connect the Lindemann and Gr\"uneisen laws. These relations permit one to evaluate the slope and curvature of a fusion curve as functions of ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{m}$, and thus to express in terms of ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{m}$ the conditions that a fusion curve be normal in the sense of Bridgman. Experimental fusion data on 13 cubic metals are used to evaluate the constant of proportionality (inversely proportional to $\ensuremath{\rho}$) in the Lindemann frequency; the values are reasonably constant. The corresponding values of $\ensuremath{\rho}$ for Al and Cu show reasonable agreement with values deduced from x-ray intensity measurements. The average $\ensuremath{\rho}$ seems significantly below values estimated by Gr\"uneisen. Good agreement with the cubic metals is found for hexagonal close-packed elements, but not for elements with more complex lattices, in general. The two evaluations of the Gr\"uneisen constant ${\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{m}$ of the solid at fusion are shown to be in good agreement, experimentally, for 14 elements checked, but agreement fails for the elements Ga, Bi, and Sb, which show abnormal fusion curves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.102.308

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Gilvarry, J. J.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1956-04-15
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
308-316
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133403032
Cited by
424
References
0
FWCI
15.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Lindemann and Grüneisen Laws. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.102.308
The paper
Gilvarry, J. J. (1956). The Lindemann and Grüneisen Laws. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.102.308

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.