The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ground State of Two-Electron Atoms
Abstract
A new method is developed for solving the wave equation for two-electron atoms. The wave function is expanded into a triple orthogonal set in three perimetric coordinates. From the wave equation one obtains an explicit recursion relation for the coefficients in the expansion, and the vanishing of the determinant of these coefficients provides the condition for the energy eigenvalues and for the eigenvectors. The determinant was solved on WEIZAC for $Z=1 \mathrm{to} 10$, using an iteration method. Since the elements of the determinant are integers, and only an average of about 20 per row are nonvanishing, it has been possible to go to an order of 214 before exceeding the capacity of the fast memory of WEIZAC. The nonrelativistic energy eigenvalues obtained for the ground state are lower than any previously published for all $Z$ from 1 to 10. In the case of helium, our nonrelativistic energy value is accurate to within 0.01 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and is 0.40 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ lower than the value computed by Kinoshita. From the wave functions obtained, the mass-polarization and the relativistic corrections were evaluated for $Z=1 \mathrm{to} 10$. Using the values of the Lamb shift computed by Kabir, Salpeter, and Sucher, we obtain an ionization potential for helium of 198 310.67 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ as against Herzberg's value of 198 ${310.8}_{2}$\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.15 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$. Comparison is also made with the available experimental data for the other values of $Z$. By the use of our magnetic tape storage, the accuracy of the nonrelativistic energy value for helium could be pushed to about 0.001 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, should future improvements in the experimental values and in the computed radiative corrections warrant it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electron affinities of the first-row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions
Kendall, R. A., Dunning, T. H., & Harrison, R. J. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462569 · Cited by 15,496
Atomic and Molecular Electron Affinities: Photoelectron Experiments and Theoretical Computations
Rienstra-Kiracofe, J. C., Tschumper, G. S., Schaefer, H. F., Nandi, S., & Ellison, G. B. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990044u · Cited by 1,258
Explicitly Correlated R12/F12 Methods for Electronic Structure
Kong, L., Bischoff, F. A., & Valeev, E. F. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200204r · Cited by 509
Collisional Breakup in a Quantum System of Three Charged Particles
Rescigno, T. N., Baertschy, M., Isaacs, W. A., & McCurdy, C. W. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2474 · Cited by 465
Møller-plesset calculations taking care of the correlation CUSP
Klopper, W., & Kutzelnigg, W. (1987) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(87)80005-2 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Pekeris, C. L.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1958-12-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1649-1658
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031130806
- Cited by
- 1,111
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ground State of Two-Electron Atoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.112.1649
- The paper
- Pekeris, C. L. (1958). Ground State of Two-Electron Atoms. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.112.1649
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.