Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 547

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optical Properties of Aluminum

Ehrenreich, H., Philipp, H. R., Segall, B.·1963·Physical Review

Abstract

The frequency-dependent complex dielectric constant $\ensuremath{\epsilon}(\ensuremath{\omega})={\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{1}+i{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{2}$ and associated functions are derived in the range 0 to 22 eV by application of the Kramers-Kronig relations to existing reflectance data for clean Al surfaces. The results are quantitatively interpreted in terms of intra- and interband transitions as well as plasma oscillations. The decomposition of $\ensuremath{\epsilon}(\ensuremath{\omega})$ into intra- and interband parts given here is seen to be valid in the presence of electron-electron interactions. Due to these interactions the optical effective mass ${m}_{a}=1.5$, deduced from experiment in the free-carrier region, is appreciably larger than that obtained using Segall's band calculations (${m}_{\mathrm{ac}}\ensuremath{\cong}1.15$). The band calculations are extended to higher energies in order to examine the effect of interband transitions for the range of interest. It is found that the only interband transitions which lead to significant structure in ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{2}(\ensuremath{\omega})$ are those that occur around $W$ and $\ensuremath{\Sigma}$ in the vicinity of $K$ in the Brillouin zone and that these produce a peak near 1.4 eV. These conclusions are in accord with the experimentally determined ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{2}(\ensuremath{\omega})$ which exhibits a peak at 1.5 eV and has no further structure at higher energies. The result of a quantitative calculation of the structure in ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{2}(\ensuremath{\omega})$ using a fine mesh of points in k space and an approximate variation of the momentum matrix element with k is in good agreement with the experimental results with respect to shape but has a magnitude which is somewhat too low. From the known influence of many-electron effects on the intraband contribution to $\ensuremath{\epsilon}(\ensuremath{\omega})$ and a general sum rule, the corresponding effect on interband transitions may be estimated and shown roughly to account for the difference. The derived $\ensuremath{\epsilon}(\ensuremath{\omega})$ indicates the presence of a sharp plasma resonance at $\ensuremath{\hbar}{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{p}=15.2$ eV, in excellent agreement with the results of characteristic energy loss experiments. It is shown that this resonance may be interpreted either in terms of electrons characterized by the low-frequency optical mass and screened by the interband dielectric constant at ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{p}$ or, since the $f$ sum has been essentially exhausted, in terms of the exact asymptotic formula for $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ in which all carriers are unscreened and have the free-electron mass.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.132.1918

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 547

Metadata

Authors
Ehrenreich, H., Philipp, H. R., & Segall, B.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1963-12-01
Volume
132
Issue
5
Pages
1918-1928
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044384343
Cited by
547
References
0
FWCI
34.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optical Properties of Aluminum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.132.1918
The paper
Ehrenreich, H., Philipp, H. R., & Segall, B. (1963). Optical Properties of Aluminum. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.132.1918

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.