The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interstitials and Vacancies inαIron
Open accessAbstract
The migration energies and atomic configurations for mono- and di-interstitials and mono- and divacancies in $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ iron have been calculated using a classical model. About 530 atoms surrounding the defect were treated as individual particles, each with three degrees of freedom, while the remainder of the crystal was treated as an elastic continuum with atoms imbedded in it. A two-body central force was devised which matched the elastic moduli, was sharply repulsive at close separation, and which went to zero midway between the second and third neighboring atoms. Configurations were found by choosing a starting configuration roughly approximating the situation under consideration and successively adjusting the value of each variable occurring in the energy equation so that the magnitude of the generalized force associated with it was zero until equilibrium was reached. The energy calculations include changes in bond energy in the discrete region, energy in the elastic field, and work done against cohesive forces, but neglect changes due to the redistribution of electrons. Calculated activation energies for motion of mono- and di-interstitials and mono- and di-vacancies were 0.33, 0.18, 0.68, and 0.66 eV, respectively, and binding energies of di-interstitials and di-vacancies were 1.08 and 0.20 eV, respectively. The stable interstitial was a "split" configuration in which two atoms were symmetrically split in a $〈110〉$ direction about a vacant normal lattice site, and the stable di-interstitial consisted of two parallel split interstitials at nearest-neighbor lattice sites with their axes perpendicular to the line joining their centers. In the vacancy configuration an atom was missing from a normal lattice site, and the divacancy consisted of two vacancies at second-nearest-neighbor lattice sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Atomistic locking and friction
Hirano, M., & Shinjo, K. (1990) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.41.11837 · Cited by 607
Vacancies and carbon impurities inα- iron: Electron irradiation
Vehanen, A., Hautojärvi, P., Johansson, J., Yli-Kauppila, J., & Moser, P. (1982) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.25.762 · Cited by 549
Multiscale modelling of defect kinetics in irradiated iron
Fu, C.-C., Torre, J. D., Willaime, F., Bocquet, J.-L., & Barbu, A. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1286 · Cited by 522
Stability and Mobility of Mono- and Di-Interstitials inα-Fe
Fu, C.-C., Willaime, F., & Ordejón, P. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.175503 · Cited by 448
Structural defects in amorphous solids A computer simulation study
Egami, T., Maeda, K., & Vitek, V. (1980) · Philosophical Magazine A · doi:10.1080/01418618008243894 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, R. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1964-06-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 5A
- Pages
- A1329-A1336
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971746583
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interstitials and Vacancies inαIron. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.134.a1329
- The paper
- Johnson, R. A. (1964). Interstitials and Vacancies inαIron. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.134.a1329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.