The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement
Abstract
We examine the assertion that the "reduction of the wave packet," implicit in the quantum theory of measurement introduces into the foundations of quantum physics a time-asymmetric element, which in turn leads to irreversibility. We argue that this time assymmetry is actually related to the manner in which statistical ensembles are constructed. If we construct an ensemble time symmetrically by using both initial and final states of the system to delimit the sample, then the resulting probability distribution turns out to be time symmetric as well. The conventional expressions for prediction as well as those for "retrodiction" may be recovered from the time-symmetric expressions formally by separating the final (or the initial) selection procedure from the measurements under consideration by sequences of "coherence destroying" manipulations. We can proceed from this situation, which resembles prediction, to true prediction (which does not involve any postselection) by adding to the time-symmetric theory a postulate which asserts that ensembles with unambiguous probability distributions may be constructed on the basis of preselection only. If, as we believe, the validity of this postulate and the falsity of its time reverse result from the macroscopic irreversibility of our universe as a whole, then the basic laws of quantum physics, including those referring to measurements, are as completely time symmetric as the laws of classical physics. As a by-product of our analysis, we also find that during the time interval between two noncommuting observations, we may assign to a system the quantum state corresponding to the observation that follows with as much justification as we assign, ordinarily, the state corresponding to the preceding measurement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- T. Gold, 1958, Onzième Conseil de l'Institut International de Physique Solvay, La Structure et l' Evolution de l'Universe
- T. Gold, 1962, Am. J. Phys., 30, 403, 10.1119/1.1942052 · DOI
- T. Gold, Proceedings of the Conference on the Arrow of Time, Cornell University, 1963
- O. Penrose, 1962, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 79, 605, 10.1088/0370-1328/79/3/318 · DOI
- J. von Neumann, 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
- D. Bohm, 1951, Quantum Theory
- E. P. Wigner, 1963, Am. J. Phys., 31, 6, 10.1119/1.1969254 · DOI · Paper page
- A. I. Khinchin, 1957, Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory
- H. Margenau, 1963, Phil. Sci., 30, 1, 10.1086/287907 · DOI
- H. Margenau, 1963, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.), 23, 469, 10.1016/0003-4916(63)90264-1 · DOI
Cited by
Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
Griffiths, R. B. (1984) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01015734 · Cited by 1,138
Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between two measurements
Aharonov, Y., & Vaidman, L. (1990) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.41.11 · Cited by 1,082
Self-citationQuantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty
D�rr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zangh�, N. (1992) · Journal of Statistical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01049004 · Cited by 712
Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics
Omnès, R. (1992) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.339 · Cited by 648
Boltzmann's Entropy and Time's Arrow
Lebowitz, J. L. (1993) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881363 · Cited by 571
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., & Lebowitz, J. L.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1964-06-22
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 6B
- Pages
- B1410-B1416
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008426564
- Cited by
- 905
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.134.b1410
- The paper
- Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., & Lebowitz, J. L. (1964). Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.134.b1410
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.