Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 905

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement

Aharonov, Yakir, Bergmann, Peter G., Lebowitz, Joel L.·1964·Physical Review

Abstract

We examine the assertion that the "reduction of the wave packet," implicit in the quantum theory of measurement introduces into the foundations of quantum physics a time-asymmetric element, which in turn leads to irreversibility. We argue that this time assymmetry is actually related to the manner in which statistical ensembles are constructed. If we construct an ensemble time symmetrically by using both initial and final states of the system to delimit the sample, then the resulting probability distribution turns out to be time symmetric as well. The conventional expressions for prediction as well as those for "retrodiction" may be recovered from the time-symmetric expressions formally by separating the final (or the initial) selection procedure from the measurements under consideration by sequences of "coherence destroying" manipulations. We can proceed from this situation, which resembles prediction, to true prediction (which does not involve any postselection) by adding to the time-symmetric theory a postulate which asserts that ensembles with unambiguous probability distributions may be constructed on the basis of preselection only. If, as we believe, the validity of this postulate and the falsity of its time reverse result from the macroscopic irreversibility of our universe as a whole, then the basic laws of quantum physics, including those referring to measurements, are as completely time symmetric as the laws of classical physics. As a by-product of our analysis, we also find that during the time interval between two noncommuting observations, we may assign to a system the quantum state corresponding to the observation that follows with as much justification as we assign, ordinarily, the state corresponding to the preceding measurement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.134.b1410

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. T. Gold, 1958, Onzième Conseil de l'Institut International de Physique Solvay, La Structure et l' Evolution de l'Universe
  2. T. Gold, 1962, Am. J. Phys., 30, 403, 10.1119/1.1942052 · DOI
  3. T. Gold, Proceedings of the Conference on the Arrow of Time, Cornell University, 1963
  4. O. Penrose, 1962, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 79, 605, 10.1088/0370-1328/79/3/318 · DOI
  5. J. von Neumann, 1955, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
  6. D. Bohm, 1951, Quantum Theory
  7. E. P. Wigner, 1963, Am. J. Phys., 31, 6, 10.1119/1.1969254 · DOI · Paper page
  8. A. I. Khinchin, 1957, Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory
  9. H. Margenau, 1963, Phil. Sci., 30, 1, 10.1086/287907 · DOI
  10. H. Margenau, 1963, Ann. Phys. (N. Y.), 23, 469, 10.1016/0003-4916(63)90264-1 · DOI

Cited by

See all 905

Metadata

Authors
Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., & Lebowitz, J. L.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1964-06-22
Volume
134
Issue
6B
Pages
B1410-B1416
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008426564
Cited by
905
References
0
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.134.b1410
The paper
Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., & Lebowitz, J. L. (1964). Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.134.b1410

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.