The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Classical Theory of Atomic Collisions. I. Theory of Inelastic Collisions
Abstract
In this paper, a classical theory of inelastic atomic collisions is evolved on the basis of the relations for binary collisions as well as for the Coulomb collisions derived in the laboratory system of coordinates. Built up as an approximation based on the binary collisions, i.e., the independent pair interactions of the individual elements of the colliding systems, the theory, with its immense simplicity, not only permits a clear qualitative interpretation of the atomic collisions, but also describes well their quantitive aspect. In terms of that theory, a majority of basic inelastic processes accompanying the atomic collisions are analyzed. In particular, calculations are made for the following: (i) ionization of atoms and molecules by light particles (electrons), as well as by heavy particles (protons, deuterons), including inner-shell ionization and double ionization; (ii) excitation of single and triplet lines (excitation with exchange and without exchange); (iii) capture of electrons in orbit; (iv) slowing down of heavy charged particles (with consideration of the capture process as well as of the interaction with the Coulomb field of the nucleus); (v) inelastic scattering of electrons on atoms and molecules. According to the theory developed, the "diffraction" of elementary particles on atomic systems is explained on the basis of corpuscular mechanics; it is shown that the discrete energy states of the scatterer electrons---and the anisotropy in the space orientation of their velocities in the case of crystals---are responsible for the main features of the diffraction pattern. Having at our disposal a simple theory without any arbitrary parameters except those describing the target system, we find it a useful tool for the investigation of atomic structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Classical theory of charge transfer and ionization of hydrogen atoms by protons
Abrines, R., & Percival, I. C. (1966) · Proceedings of the Physical Society · doi:10.1088/0370-1328/88/4/306 · Cited by 684
Hovington, P., Drouin, D., & Gauvin, R. (1997) · Scanning · doi:10.1002/sca.4950190101 · Cited by 655
New model for electron-impact ionization cross sections of molecules
Hwang, W., Kim, Y.-K., & Rudd, M. E. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.471116 · Cited by 586
Cumpson, P. J., & Seah, M. P. (1997) · Surface and Interface Analysis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9918(199706)25:6<430::aid-sia254>3.0.co;2-7 · Cited by 530
Electron production in proton collisions with atoms and molecules: energy distributions
Rudd, M. E., Kim, Y. K., Madison, D. H., & Gay, T. J. (1992) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.441 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Gryziński, M.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1965-04-19
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 2A
- Pages
- A336-A358
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036937934
- Cited by
- 1,221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classical Theory of Atomic Collisions. I. Theory of Inelastic Collisions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.138.a336
- The paper
- Gryziński, M. (1965). Classical Theory of Atomic Collisions. I. Theory of Inelastic Collisions. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.138.a336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.