Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Flux-Flow Resistance in Type-II Superconductors

Kim, Y. B., Hempstead, C. F., Strnad, A. R.·1965·Physical Review

Abstract

Electrical resistance of type-II superconductors measured by a dc method is related to the motion of Abrikosov vortices. Flux lines in the mixed state are driven into a viscous-flow state by increasing the Lorentz force J\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}H beyond the depinning threshold; the voltage observed under this condition is linear in current and the slope $\frac{\ensuremath{\Delta}V}{\ensuremath{\Delta}I}$ is interpreted to represent the flow rate. At low temperatures, the flow resistivity ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{f}$ so measured follows an empirical relation $\frac{{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{f}}{{\ensuremath{\rho}}_{n}}=\frac{H}{{H}_{c2}}$, where ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{n}$ is the normal-state resistivity and ${H}_{c2}$ the upper critical field predicted by the Ginsburg-Landau-Abrikosov-Gor'kov (GLAG) theory. In high-field superconductors the GLAG upper critical fields are not accessible for conventional measurements since the paramagnetic spin alignment quenches superconductivity at much lower fields, but the above empirical rule still holds and makes it possible to determine the GLAG upper critical fields from the flow-resistivity measurements. The empirical relation also suggests that the frictional drag on a moving flux line arises from normal currents flowing in the core of the vortex line. The observed damping is, however, much larger than can be accounted for by eddy currents induced by the moving magnetic field of the vortex line. Two new mechanisms, one proposed by Tinkham and another by Stephen and Bardeen, appear to correct this difficulty and they are discussed in the text. Also reported is a new type of resistance-minimum phenomenon: if the temperature $T$ is increased from zero at a fixed field $H$, the resistance $R(T)$ of a type-II specimen decreases initially and goes through a minimum before it reaches the normal resistance at ${T}_{c}(H)$. This behavior is qualitatively accounted for by including the dissipation outside of the vortex core.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.139.a1163

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Kim, Y. B., Hempstead, C. F., & Strnad, A. R.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1965-08-16
Volume
139
Issue
4A
Pages
A1163-A1172
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040143475
Cited by
593
References
16
FWCI
25.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flux-Flow Resistance in Type-II Superconductors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.139.a1163
The paper
Kim, Y. B., Hempstead, C. F., & Strnad, A. R. (1965). Flux-Flow Resistance in Type-II Superconductors. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.139.a1163

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.