The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Self-Consistent-Field Wave Functions for Hole States of Some Ne-Like and Ar-Like Ions
Abstract
Analytic self-consistent-field (SCF) wave functions were computed for the ground states of the closed-shell atomic systems ${\mathrm{F}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, Ne, and ${\mathrm{Na}}^{+}$, and ${\mathrm{Cl}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, Ar, and ${\mathrm{K}}^{+}$; and for those ground and excited states of the open-shell systems which are obtained by removing a single electron from any one of the occupied shells of these closed-shell systems. Details of the calculation of the functions are presented, with emphasis on a justification of the procedures used for the calculations for excited states. A high accuracy is obtained; the calculations for the closed-shell systems give the most accurate analytic SCF wave functions which have yet been reported. Ionization potentials are calculated and compared with experimental values. Computed ionization potentials for the removal of a $2s$ electron from ${\mathrm{Cl}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$, Ar, and ${\mathrm{K}}^{+}$, for which no direct experimental data are available, are estimated to be accurate to 1%. It is found that the removal of an electron from the outermost $s$ shell increases the correlation energy, in contradiction to the predictions of a recently proposed semiempirical scheme for estimating the correlation energy. For example, the magnitude of the correlation energy of the lowest $^{2}S$ state of ${\mathrm{Ar}}^{+}$ is \ensuremath{\sim}4 eV greater than the magnitude of the correlation energy of neutral Ar. The effect of the nonzero off-diagonal Lagrangian multipliers is considered and found to be important for the inner shell hole states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
The interpretation of XPS spectra: Insights into materials properties
Bagus, P. S., Ilton, E. S., & Nelin, C. J. (2013) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2013.03.001 · Cited by 448
Self-citationOrbital electron capture by the nucleus
Bambynek, W., Behrens, H., Chen, M. H., Crasemann, B., Fitzpatrick, M. L., Ledingham, K. W. D., Genz, H., Mutterer, M., & Intemann, R. L. (1977) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.49.77 · Cited by 441
Self-consistent-field calculations of core excited states
Besley, N. A., Gilbert, A. T. B., & Gill, P. M. W. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3092928 · Cited by 329
Simulating X-ray Spectroscopies and Calculating Core-Excited States of Molecules
Norman, P., & Dreuw, A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00156 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagus, P. S.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1965-08-02
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 3A
- Pages
- A619-A634
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077624619
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-Consistent-Field Wave Functions for Hole States of Some Ne-Like and Ar-Like Ions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.139.a619
- The paper
- Bagus, P. S. (1965). Self-Consistent-Field Wave Functions for Hole States of Some Ne-Like and Ar-Like Ions. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.139.a619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.