Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Theoretical Discussion of the Inverse Faraday Effect, Raman Scattering, and Related Phenomena

Pershan, P. S., van der Ziel, J. P., Malmstrom, L. D.·1966·Physical Review

Abstract

The inverse Faraday effect (IFE) occurs when circularly polarized light incident on a nonabsorbing crystal induces a magnetic moment proportional to the Verdet constant of that material, the proportionality constant being independent of the material. Some experimental details relating to the observation and proof of the IFE are presented. A microscopic, or quantum-mechanical, explanation of the IFE which also demonstrates its connection with the Faraday effect is given in terms of an optically induced "effective Hamiltonian" ${\mathcal{H}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$. Conventional calculations of the optical constants like the Verdet constant compute optical-frequency polarizabilities for a given electronic configuration. It is shown here that these same constants are obtained by computing the average effects that optical fields have on the atomic configuration. The optically induced ${\mathcal{H}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ is linearly dependent on the low-frequency components of $E(t)E(t)$ and one can show the thermal average ${〈{\mathcal{H}}_{\mathrm{eff}}〉}_{\mathrm{thermal}}$ is equal to the temporl average ${〈\mathbf{E}(t)\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathbf{\ensuremath{\varepsilon}}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}(\mathbf{E}t)〉}_{\mathrm{time}}$. Both the Verdet constant and the IFE coefficient arise from a thermal average of the same term in ${\mathcal{H}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$. Similarly the Cotton-Mouton effect and its inverse arise from one other term in ${\mathcal{H}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$. Definition of ${\mathcal{H}}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ is one technique for linearizing some nonlinear optical problems. Following linearization one obtains Kramers-Kronig-type dispersion relations between constants of seemingly different phenomena. For example, a Kramers-Kronig relation is obtained between the Verdet constant and the gain coefficient for stimulated Raman scattering by paramagnetic ions in a large dc magnetic field. The effective Hamiltonian is explicitly evaluated from some illustrative examples and its general phenomenological form for a paramagnetic ion in cubic symmetry is written down and discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.143.574

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Pershan, P. S., van der Ziel, J. P., & Malmstrom, L. D.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1966-03-11
Volume
143
Issue
2
Pages
574-583
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062682166
Cited by
422
References
0
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Discussion of the Inverse Faraday Effect, Raman Scattering, and Related Phenomena. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.143.574
The paper
Pershan, P. S., van der Ziel, J. P., & Malmstrom, L. D. (1966). Theoretical Discussion of the Inverse Faraday Effect, Raman Scattering, and Related Phenomena. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.143.574

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.