Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 744

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impurity-Band Tails in the High-Density Limit. I. Minimum Counting Methods

Halperin, B. I., Lax, Melvin·1966·Physical Review

Abstract

A new approximate method is presented for calculating the density of states and one-electron Green's function in the low-energy tail of a high-density impurity band. Such states occur in regions of large attractive potential produced by unusually high (random) concentrations of attractive centers and/or unusually low concentrations of repulsive centers. These well-separated deep wells each have one bound state of lowest energy. The distribution of these lowest levels vields the low-energy tail. For any one well, a bound-state energy $E({\mathbf{x}}_{0})$ is estimated variationally using $\ensuremath{\psi}(\mathbf{x})=f(\mathbf{x}\ensuremath{-}{\mathbf{x}}_{0})$, where $f(\mathbf{x})$ has any fixed form. The best energy for any well is obtained by minimizing $E({\mathbf{x}}_{0})$ with respect to ${\mathbf{x}}_{0}$ in the vicinity of that well. The number of wells that contribute to the density of states at energy $E$ is given by the number of local minima in $E({\mathbf{x}}_{0})$ that occur at the level $E$. In the high-density limit, Gaussian statistics are adequate for treating the potential fluctuations and the expectation value for the density of states is easily calculated. At low energies the best choice for the function $f$ is that which maximizes the expected density of states. Application to an exactly soluble one-dimensional model, a Gaussian "white noise" potential, yields the correct asymptotic form $\ensuremath{\rho}(E)=\mathrm{const}|E|\mathrm{exp}[\ensuremath{-}(\frac{4}{3}){|2E|}^{\frac{3}{2}}]$. In three dimensions, the density of states in the Gaussian approximation is found to have the form $\ensuremath{\rho}(E)=[\frac{A(E)}{{\ensuremath{\xi}}^{2}}]\mathrm{exp}[\frac{\ensuremath{-}B(E)}{(2\ensuremath{\xi})}]$, where $\ensuremath{\xi}$ is proportional to the concentration of impurities and to the square of the strength of the impurity potential. For screened, charged impurities, $B(E)={E}_{{Q}^{2}}b(\ensuremath{\nu})$, $A(E)={Q}^{3}{E}_{{Q}^{3}}a(\ensuremath{\nu})$, where ${E}_{Q}=\frac{{\ensuremath{\hbar}}^{2}{Q}^{2}}{(2{m}^{*})}$, ($\frac{1}{Q}$) is the screening radius, and $\ensuremath{\nu}=\frac{({E}_{0}\ensuremath{-}E)}{{E}_{Q}}$ is the energy below the mean potential ${E}_{0}$ in units of ${E}_{Q}$. Computer-calculated curves are provided for the "universal" dimensionless functions $a(\ensuremath{\nu})$ and $b(\ensuremath{\nu})$. The exponent $b(\ensuremath{\nu})$ behaves like ${\ensuremath{\nu}}^{\frac{1}{2}}$ when $\ensuremath{\nu}$ is small (strong screening) and behaves like ${\ensuremath{\nu}}^{2}$ when $\ensuremath{\nu}$ is large (weak screening).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.148.722

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 744

Metadata

Authors
Halperin, B. I., & Lax, M.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1966-08-12
Volume
148
Issue
2
Pages
722-740
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078099125
Cited by
744
References
0
FWCI
24.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impurity-Band Tails in the High-Density Limit. I. Minimum Counting Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.148.722
The paper
Halperin, B. I., & Lax, M. (1966). Impurity-Band Tails in the High-Density Limit. I. Minimum Counting Methods. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.148.722

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.