The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Covalency upon Rare-Earth Ligand Field Splittings
Abstract
Experimental results for the shift with uniaxial stress of the $(^{2}F_{\frac{5}{2}},{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7})\ensuremath{\rightarrow}(^{2}F_{\frac{7}{2}},{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7})$ laser transition in ${\mathrm{Tm}}^{2+}$:Ca${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{Tm}}^{2+}$:Sr${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ are presented. The results, 1.75 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$${(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{n}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2})}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ and 1.78 ${\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$${(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{n}/{\mathrm{cm}}^{2})}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$, are used to calculate the radial dependence of the cubic ligand field splitting. The resulting dependence is somewhat larger than that predicted by the familiar electrostatic model for the splitting. Partially to determine its influence on the above result, we have considered the effect of covalency by means of a semiempirical molecular-orbital model. The overlap of the $4f$ orbitals with the neighboring fluoride ions was calculated using Hartree-Fock wave functions and known internuclear distances. The off-diagonal elements of the interaction Hamiltonian were obtained from the Wolfsberg-Helmholz approximation ${H}_{\mathrm{ij}}=\frac{2{S}_{\mathrm{ij}}({H}_{\mathrm{ii}}+{H}_{\mathrm{jj}})}{2}$. A range of reasonable values for the diagonal elements were obtained by analogy with those necessary to explain iron-series splittings. The largest group overlap of the $4f$ wave function with ${\mathrm{F}}^{1\ensuremath{-}}$ ligands was found to be 3.6% and leads to a sizable (our best estimate in Ca${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ is 50%) covalent contribution to the ligand field splitting. We have also investigated some of the consequences of a covalent contribution of this magnitude. The radial dependence of the covalent part of the energy is greater than for the electrostatic part. The resulting radial dependence is thus in better agreement with experiment. Transferred hyperfine effects are calculated and compared to experiment, but the extent of the agreement is hard to ascertain because of uncertainty of the sign of the experimental quantity and polarization effects. The calculated orbital reduction factor for ${\mathrm{Tm}}^{2+}$:Ca${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ is found to be much smaller than is observed. We have also calculated the expected variation of the ${(\mathrm{rare}\mathrm{earth})}^{3+}\ensuremath{-}{F}^{1\ensuremath{-}}$ overlap as a function of atomic number.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- C. A. Hutchison, 1958, J. Chem. Phys., 29, 754, 10.1063/1.1744587 · doi:10.1063/1.1744587
- E. Y. Wong, 1962, J. Chem. Phys., 36, 1889, 10.1063/1.1701285 · doi:10.1063/1.1701285
- G. Burns, 1962, Phys. Rev., 128, 2121, 10.1103/PhysRev.128.2121 · doi:10.1103/physrev.128.2121
- M. T. Hutchings, 1963, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 81, 633, 10.1088/0370-1328/81/4/307 · DOI
- C. J. Lenander, 1963, J. Chem. Phys., 38, 2750, 10.1063/1.1733584 · doi:10.1063/1.1733584
- D. K. Ray, 1963, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 82, 47, 10.1088/0370-1328/82/1/307 · DOI
- R. E. Watson, 1964, Phys. Rev., 133, A1571, 10.1103/PhysRev.133.A1571 · doi:10.1103/physrev.133.a1571
- G. Burns, 1965, J. Chem. Phys., 42, 377, 10.1063/1.1695703 · doi:10.1063/1.1695703
- J. M. Baker, 1963, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London), 82, 742, 10.1088/0370-1328/82/5/312 · doi:10.1088/0370-1328/82/5/312
- R. G. Bessent, 1964, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A285, 430
- C. K. Jorgensen, 1963, J. Chem. Phys., 39, 1422, 10.1063/1.1734458 · DOI · Paper page
- A. A. Kaplianskii, 1959, Opt. Spectry. (USSR), 7, 406
- W. A. Runcimann, 1963, J. Chem. Phys., 38, 279, 10.1063/1.1733484 · doi:10.1063/1.1733484
- H. G. Drickamer, 1965, Solid State Physics
- Z. J. Kiss, 1962, Phys. Rev., 127, 718, 10.1103/PhysRev.127.718 · DOI · Paper page
- W. Hayes, 1961, J. Chem. Phys., 35, 152, 10.1063/1.1732094 · DOI
- G. Burns, 1965, Phys. Letters, 19, 98, 10.1016/0031-9163(65)90728-6 · doi:10.1016/0031-9163(65)90728-6
- C. J. Ballhausen, 1964, Molecular Orbital Theory
- C. J. Ballhausen, 1962, Ligand Field Theory
- A. A. Kaplianskii, 1964, Opt. i Spektroskopiya, 16, 1031
- B. Bleaney, 1964, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A277, 289, 10.1098/rspa.1964.0023 · DOI
- Z. J. Kiss, 1965, Phys. Rev., 137, A1749, 10.1103/PhysRev.137.A1749 · DOI
- J. D. Eshelby, 1956, Solid State Physics
- J. Friedel, 1955, Phil. Mag., 46, 514, 10.1080/14786440508520587 · DOI
- F. D. Murnaghan, 1951, Finite Deformation of an Elastic Solid
- H. Brooks, 1955, Impurities and Imperfections
- D. R. Huffman, 1960, Phys. Rev., 117, 709, 10.1103/PhysRev.117.709 · DOI
- D. Gerlich, 1964, Phys. Rev., 136, A1366, 10.1103/PhysRev.136.A1366 · DOI
- T. P. Das, 1965, Phys. Rev., 140, A1957, 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1957 · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1957
- J. C. Eisenstein, 1960, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A255, 181, 10.1098/rspa.1960.0061 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1960.0061
- J. D. Axe, the Photoduplication Service, ADI Auxiliary Publications Project
- P. W. Anderson, 1963, Solid State Physics
- R. S. Mulliken, 1949, J. Chem. Phys., 17, 1248, 10.1063/1.1747150 · doi:10.1063/1.1747150
- D. H. Templeton, 1954, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76, 5237, 10.1021/ja01649a087 · DOI
- A. J. Freeman, 1962, Phys. Rev., 127, 2058, 10.1103/PhysRev.127.2058 · DOI · Paper page
- T. R. McGuire, 1964, J. Appl. Phys., 35, 984, 10.1063/1.1713568 · doi:10.1063/1.1713568
- C. K. Jorgensen, 1962, Absorption Spectra and Chemical Bonding in Complexes
- G. Burns, J. Chem. Phys.
- K. W. H. Stevens, 1953, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), A219, 542, 10.1098/rspa.1953.0166 · doi:10.1098/rspa.1953.0166
- M. Inoue, 1963, Phys. Rev. Letters, 11, 196, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.196 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.11.196
- R. Orbach, 1966, Phys. Rev., 143, 168, 10.1103/PhysRev.143.168 · doi:10.1103/physrev.143.168
- R. E. Watson, 1961, Phys. Rev. Letters, 6, 277, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.6.277 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.6.277
- A. A. Kaplianskii, 1962, Opt. Spectroskopiya, 13, 882
- M. H. Cohen, 1961, Phys. Rev., 122, 1821, 10.1103/PhysRev.122.1821 · DOI
- R. G. Schulman, 1962, Phys. Rev., 130, 506, 10.1103/PhysRev.130.506 · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.506
- K. Knox, 1962, Phys. Rev., 130, 512, 10.1103/PhysRev.130.512 · doi:10.1103/physrev.130.512
- S. Sugano, 1962, Phys. Rev., 130, 517, 10.1103/PhysRev.130.517 · DOI · Paper page
- R. E. Watson, 1964, Phys. Rev., 134, A1526, 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A1526 · doi:10.1103/physrev.134.a1526
- E. Simanek, 1964, Phys. Status Solidi, 4, 251, 10.1002/pssb.19640040204 · doi:10.1002/pssb.19640040204
- J. Hubbard, 1966, Proc. Phys. Soc., 88, 13, 10.1088/0370-1328/88/1/304 · doi:10.1088/0370-1328/88/1/304
- S. Sugano, 1965, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 20, 1155, 10.1143/JPSJ.20.1155 · doi:10.1143/jpsj.20.1155
- D. W. Hafemeister, 1965, J. Chem. Phys., 43, 795, 10.1063/1.1696846 · doi:10.1063/1.1696846
Cited by
Theory of lanthanide crystal fields
Newman, D. J. (1971) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018737100101241 · Cited by 689
5d-level energies ofCe3+and the crystalline environment. I. Fluoride compounds
Dorenbos, P. (2000) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.62.15640 · Cited by 396
Stedman, G. E., & Newman, D. J. (1971) · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids · doi:10.1016/s0022-3697(71)80165-8 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Axe, J. D., & Burns, G.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1966-12-02
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 331-340
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990739555
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.