The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spectroscopic Investigation of Group-III Acceptor States in Silicon
Abstract
The excitation spectra associated with the group-III acceptor impurities; boron, aluminum, gallium, and indium in silicon, have been studied at low temperatures using grating spectrometers. The behavior of these spectra under uniaxial stress has been studied employing polarized radiation. The improved resolution of the present investigation has revealed details not reported previously for the zero-stress spectra. The line reported by earlier workers at 68.26 meV for gallium impurity has been resolved into three components at 67.95, 68.25, and 68.43 meV. For aluminum and indium impurity, the lines at 64.99 and 150.88 meV, respectively, have each been resolved into two components, at 64.96 and 65.16 meV and at 150.80 and 151.08 meV, respectively. The presence of the shoulder at 39.91 meV on the excitation line of boron at 39.64 meV has been confirmed. Also, transitions from the ground state associated with the ${p}_{\frac{3}{2}}$ valence band to excited states associated with the split-off ${p}_{\frac{1}{2}}$ valence band have been observed for gallium and indium impurity, in addition to those of boron and aluminum reported previously. It has been established that the ground state has ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$ symmetry for all the impurities studied. The first three excited states participating in the optical transitions (corresponding to lines 1-3) also have ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$ symmetry. The behavior of the line-4 complex under stress is consistent with the final states being ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{6}+{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7}+{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$. The stress-induced sublevels of the ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$ final states of lines 1 and 2 have opposite ordering for compression along $〈111〉$. The various states of a given impurity differ in their quantitative response to stress. Also, there are marked differences in the quantitative stress behavior of these states from impurity to impurity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motion of Electrons and Holes in Perturbed Periodic Fields
Luttinger, J. M., & Kohn, W. (1955) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.97.869 · Cited by 3,088
Cited by
Cubic contributions to the spherical model of shallow acceptor states
Baldereschi, A., & Lipari, N. O. (1974) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.9.1525 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Onton, A., Fisher, P., & Ramdas, A. K.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1967-11-15
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 686-703
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038414244
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectroscopic Investigation of Group-III Acceptor States in Silicon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.163.686
- The paper
- Onton, A., Fisher, P., & Ramdas, A. K. (1967). Spectroscopic Investigation of Group-III Acceptor States in Silicon. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.163.686
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.