Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spectroscopic Investigation of Group-III Acceptor States in Silicon

Onton, A., Fisher, P., Ramdas, A. K.·1967·Physical Review

Abstract

The excitation spectra associated with the group-III acceptor impurities; boron, aluminum, gallium, and indium in silicon, have been studied at low temperatures using grating spectrometers. The behavior of these spectra under uniaxial stress has been studied employing polarized radiation. The improved resolution of the present investigation has revealed details not reported previously for the zero-stress spectra. The line reported by earlier workers at 68.26 meV for gallium impurity has been resolved into three components at 67.95, 68.25, and 68.43 meV. For aluminum and indium impurity, the lines at 64.99 and 150.88 meV, respectively, have each been resolved into two components, at 64.96 and 65.16 meV and at 150.80 and 151.08 meV, respectively. The presence of the shoulder at 39.91 meV on the excitation line of boron at 39.64 meV has been confirmed. Also, transitions from the ground state associated with the ${p}_{\frac{3}{2}}$ valence band to excited states associated with the split-off ${p}_{\frac{1}{2}}$ valence band have been observed for gallium and indium impurity, in addition to those of boron and aluminum reported previously. It has been established that the ground state has ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$ symmetry for all the impurities studied. The first three excited states participating in the optical transitions (corresponding to lines 1-3) also have ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$ symmetry. The behavior of the line-4 complex under stress is consistent with the final states being ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{6}+{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{7}+{\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$. The stress-induced sublevels of the ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{8}$ final states of lines 1 and 2 have opposite ordering for compression along $〈111〉$. The various states of a given impurity differ in their quantitative response to stress. Also, there are marked differences in the quantitative stress behavior of these states from impurity to impurity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.163.686

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Onton, A., Fisher, P., & Ramdas, A. K.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1967-11-15
Volume
163
Issue
3
Pages
686-703
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038414244
Cited by
204
References
1
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spectroscopic Investigation of Group-III Acceptor States in Silicon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.163.686
The paper
Onton, A., Fisher, P., & Ramdas, A. K. (1967). Spectroscopic Investigation of Group-III Acceptor States in Silicon. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.163.686

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.