Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum Noise. XI. Multitime Correspondence between Quantum and Classical Stochastic Processes

Lax, Melvin·1968·Physical Review

Abstract

A correspondence ${a}_{j}\ensuremath{\leftrightarrow}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{j}$ between operators $\mathrm{a}=[{a}_{1}, {a}_{2}, \ensuremath{\cdots}{a}_{f}]$ and $c$ numbers $\ensuremath{\alpha}=[{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{1}, {\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{2}, \ensuremath{\cdots}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{f}]$ together with an arbitrary ordering rule $\mathcal{C}$ (e.g., in sequence from 1 to $f$) permit an association $M(\mathrm{a})=\mathcal{C}{M}^{(c)}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ between a general operator $M(\mathrm{a})$ and an associated $c$ number function ${M}^{(c)}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$. A quasiprobability $P(\ensuremath{\alpha}, t)$ is then defined so that a general ensemble average can be written as an ordinary integration: $〈M(\mathrm{a}(t))〉=\ensuremath{\int}{M}^{(c)}(\ensuremath{\alpha})d\ensuremath{\alpha}P(\ensuremath{\alpha}, t)$. The equation for $\frac{\ensuremath{\partial}P(\ensuremath{\alpha}, t)}{\ensuremath{\partial}t}$ suggests that the $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ obeys a classical Markoff process. If this classical Markoff process is taken literally, multitime classical averages can be computed. Do these correspond to appropriate quantum averages? For the case of field operators such that $[b, {b}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}]=1$, important in discussing laser statistics, we show that with ${a}_{1}={b}^{\ifmmode\dagger\else\textdagger\fi{}}$ and ${a}_{f}=b$, the classical multitime average is equivalent to the average of the corresponding quantum operators written in time-ordered, normal-ordered sequence. For the atomic operators in a laser problem, we obtain the desired correspondence, but find that the more complicated commutation rules necessarily lead to derivative correction terms when multitime averages are taken. Our derivation of multitime averages is based on the quantum regression theorem. We show that this theorem is equivalent to assuming the quantum system to be Markoffian, by showing that it leads to an appropriate factorization of a multitime density matrix and to a Chapman-Kolmogoroff-like condition on the conditional density matrix.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.172.350

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Lax, M.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1968-08-10
Volume
172
Issue
2
Pages
350-361
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978607448
Cited by
443
References
2
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum Noise. XI. Multitime Correspondence between Quantum and Classical Stochastic Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.172.350
The paper
Lax, M. (1968). Quantum Noise. XI. Multitime Correspondence between Quantum and Classical Stochastic Processes. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.172.350

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.