The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diabatic and Adiabatic Representations for Atomic Collision Problems
Abstract
The equations of the general Born-Oppenheimer separation into electronic and heavy-particle coordinates are re-examined, and the coupled equations that result for the heavy-particle motion are expressed in a particularly simple form. This is accomplished by introducing a generalized matrix operator for the effective momentum associated with the heavy particles; the matrix portion of this operator represents a coupling of the nuclear momentum with the electronic motion. The commutator between the momentum and potential matrices is a force matrix, which provides an alternative means of evaluating the momentum matrix. The momentum coupling has both radial and angular parts; the angular momentum coupling agrees with Thorson's expression. In the usual adiabatic molecular representation, the potential energy matrix is diagonalized, and all the coupling is thrown into the radial and angular momentum matrices. For collision problems it is often more important to diagonalize the radial momentum matrix, putting the radial off-diagonal coupling into the potential matrix; this generates a family of diabatic representations, the most important of which dissociates to unique separated atom states. This standard diabatic representations has the properties called for by Lichten, is uniquely defined even with the inclusion of configuration interaction, and leads immediately to the Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg limiting case under appropriate conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels
Zener, C. (1932) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1932.0165 · Cited by 4,572
Cited by
Colloquium : Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms
Dalibard, J., Gerbier, F., Juzeliūnas, G., & Öhberg, P. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1523 · Cited by 2,033
Trajectory Surface Hopping Approach to Nonadiabatic Molecular Collisions: The Reaction of H+ with D2
Tully, J. C., & Preston, R. K. (1971) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1675788 · Cited by 1,636
Ab Initio Nonadiabatic Quantum Molecular Dynamics
Curchod, B. F. E., & Martínez, T. J. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00423 · Cited by 709
MCSCF study of the avoided curve crossing of the two lowest 1Σ+ states of LiF
Werner, H.-J., & Meyer, W. (1981) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.440893 · Cited by 344
Nonadiabatic Events and Conical Intersections
Matsika, S., & Krause, P. (2011) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103450 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, F. T.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1969-03-05
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-123
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025357349
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diabatic and Adiabatic Representations for Atomic Collision Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.179.111
- The paper
- Smith, F. T. (1969). Diabatic and Adiabatic Representations for Atomic Collision Problems. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.179.111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.