Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,120

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the Resistance Experienced by Spheres in their Motion through Gases

Epstein, Paul S.·1924·Physical Review

Abstract

Kinetic theory of the resistance to a sphere moving through a gas.--- (1) Droplets small in comparison with the mean free path. The high degree of accuracy achieved in the experimental determination of the law of motions of droplets through gases, makes a careful theoretical examination of the problem desirable. Assuming the usual Maxwellian distribution of velocities in the gas, the force exerted by the impinging molecules is found to be $M$ where $M=(\frac{4\ensuremath{\pi}}{3}) \mathrm{Nm}{a}^{2}{c}_{m}V$, $N$, $m$, $a$, and ${c}_{m}$ being the number per unit volume, mass, radius, and mean speed of the molecules and $V$ the speed of the droplet. The force exerted by the molecules leaving the surface depends on how they leave. (1) For uniform evaporation from the whole surface, the force is $\ensuremath{-}M$; (2) for specular reflection of all the impinging molecules, $\ensuremath{-}M$; (3) for diffuse reflection with unchanged distribution of velocities, $\ensuremath{-}(\frac{13}{9})M$; (4) for diffuse reflection with the Maxwell distribution corresponding to the effective temperature of the part of the surface they come from, $\ensuremath{-}(\frac{1+9\ensuremath{\pi}}{64})M$, for a non-conducting droplet (4a), and $\ensuremath{-}(\frac{1+\ensuremath{\pi}}{8})M$, for a perfectly conducting droplet (4b). Cases (1) and (2) can not be distinguished experimentally, but (2) is more probable physically. The experimental values agree with 1/10 specular reflection, case (2), and 9/10 diffuse reflection, case (4a) or (4b). For large values of $\frac{l}{a}$, the droplet behaves like a perfect conductor, case (4b). (2) Comparatively large spheres. The distribution of velocities is no longer Maxwellian because of the hydrodynamic stresses which can not now be neglected. The new law is derived (Eq. 47). The conditions at the surface of the sphere are discussed and it is shown that the diffusely reflected molecules have a Maxwellian distribution corresponding to the temperature and density of the gas, just as though they were reflected with conservation of velocity (specularly). The assumptions of Bassett are theoretically justified and a complete confirmation is obtained for the correction factor for Stokes' law [$1+0.7004 (\frac{2}{s\ensuremath{-}1}) (\frac{l}{a})$] on which Millikan's conclusions are based, especially as to the percentage of specular reflection. (3) Rotating spheres are also considered in an appendix, and the values of the resistance are derived for various cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.23.710

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,120

Metadata

Authors
Epstein, P. S.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1924-06-01
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
710-733
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050870661
Cited by
1,120
References
3
FWCI
16.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.