Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Assignment of Quantum Numbers for Electrons in Molecules. I

Mulliken, Robert S.·1928·Physical Review

Abstract

Quantum numbers, notation, closed shells, molecular states.---The problem of making a complete assignment of quantum numbers for the electrons in a (non-rotating) diatomic molecule is considered. A tentative assignment of such quantum numbers is made in this paper (cf. Table III) for most of the known electronic states of diatomic molecules composed of atoms of the first short period of the periodic system. The assignments are based mainly on band spectrum, and to a lesser extent on ionization potential and positive ray, data. The methods used involve the application and extension of Hund's theoretical work on the electronic states of molecules. Although the actual state of the electrons in a molecule, as contrasted with an atom, cannot ordinarily be expected to be described accurately by quantum numbers corresponding to simple mechanical quantities, such quantum numbers can nevertheless be assigned formally, with the understanding that their mechanical interpretation in the real molecule (obtainable by an adiabatic correlation) may differ markedly from that corresponding to a literal interpretation. With this understanding, a suitable choice of quantum numbers for a diatomic molecule appears to be one corresponding to an atom in a strong electric field, namely, quantum numbers ${n}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$, ${l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$, ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{{l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}}$, and ${s}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}({s}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}=\frac{1}{2} \mathrm{always})$ for the $\ensuremath{\tau}'\mathrm{th}$ electron, and quantum numbers $s$, ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{l}$, and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{s}$ for the molecule as a whole (${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{{l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{s}$ represent quantized components of ${l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$ and $s$, respectively, with reference to the line joining the nuclei). These quantum numbers may be thought of as those associated with the imagined "united atom" formed by bringing the nuclei of the molecule together. A notation is then proposed whereby the state of each electron and of the molecule as a whole can be designated, e.g. ${(1{s}^{s})}^{2}{(2{s}^{p})}^{2}{(2{s}^{s})}^{2}(2{p}^{p})$, $^{2}P$ for a seven-electron molecule with ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{l}=1$, $s=\frac{1}{2}$; in a symbol such as $2{s}^{p}$ the superscript denotes ${l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}$, the main letter, ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{{l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}}$, thus $2{s}^{p}$ means that the electron in question has ${n}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}=2$, ${l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}=1$, ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{l\ensuremath{\tau}}=0$. Electrons with ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{{l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}}=0, 1, 2, \ensuremath{\cdots}$, are referred to as $s, p, d, \ensuremath{\cdots}$, electrons. It is shown that in a molecule it is usually natural to define a group of equivalent electrons giving a resultant ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{l}=0$, $s=0$ as a closed shell; in this sense, two $s$ electrons, or four $p, or d, f, \ensuremath{\cdots}$, electrons form a closed shell. The possible molecular states corresponding to various electron configurations are deduced by means of the Pauli principle (cf. Table I, and Appendix).Promoted electrons, binding energy, bonding power, and relation of molecular to atomic electron states.---As Hund has shown, some of the electrons must undergo an increase in their $n$ values (principal quantum numbers) when atoms unite to form a molecule. Such electrons are here called promoted electrons. The electrons in a molecule may be classified according to their bonding power, positive, zero, or negative. Electrons whose presence tends to hold a molecule together, as judged by the fact that their removal from a stable molecule causes a decrease in the energy of dissociation $D$ or an increase in the equilibrium internuclear separation ${r}_{0}$ may be said to have positive bonding power, and are identified with, or defined as, bonding electrons. The definitions of bonding power in terms of changes of $D$, and of changes of ${r}_{0}$, are unfortunately not in general equivalent, and we must accordingly distinguish "energy-bonding-power" and "distance-binding-power". On the whole, promoted electrons should tend to show negative energy-bonding-power, unpromoted electrons positive energy-bonding-power, but much should depend on "orbit dimensions."Certain rules governing the relations of the electronic states of a molecule to those of its dissociation products are discussed; in addition to theoretical rules established by Hund in regard to ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{l}$ and $s$ values, another, presumably less strict, rule is here proposed, namely that the ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{{l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}}$ values of all the atomic electrons before union should be preserved in the molecule (${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{{l}_{\ensuremath{\tau}}}$ conservation rule). Selection rules for electronic transitions are also discussed; in addition to rules given by Hund, the following are proposed: $\ens

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.32.186

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Mulliken, R. S.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1928-08-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
186-222
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071411122
Cited by
358
References
10
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Assignment of Quantum Numbers for Electrons in Molecules. I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.32.186
The paper
Mulliken, R. S. (1928). The Assignment of Quantum Numbers for Electrons in Molecules. I. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.32.186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.