The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Note on the Radiation Field of the Electron
Abstract
Previous methods of treating radiative corrections in non-stationary processes such as the scattering of an electron in an atomic field or the emission of a $\ensuremath{\beta}$-ray, by an expansion in powers of $\frac{{e}^{2}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c}$, are defective in that they predict infinite low frequency corrections to the transition probabilities. This difficulty can be avoided by a method developed here which is based on the alternative assumption that $\frac{{e}^{2}\ensuremath{\omega}}{m{c}^{3}}$, $\frac{\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}}{m{c}^{2}}$ and $\frac{\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\omega}}{c\ensuremath{\Delta}p}$ ($\ensuremath{\omega}$ = angular frequency of radiation, $\ensuremath{\Delta}p$ = change in momentum of electron) are small compared to unity. In contrast to the expansion in powers of $\frac{{e}^{2}}{\ensuremath{\hbar}c}$, this permits the transition to the classical limit $\ensuremath{\hbar}=0$. External perturbations on the electron are treated in the Born approximation. It is shown that for frequencies such that the above three parameters are negligible the quantum mechanical calculation yields just the directly reinterpreted results of the classical formulae, namely that the total probability of a given change in the motion of the electron is unaffected by the interaction with radiation, and that the mean number of emitted quanta is infinite in such a way that the mean radiated energy is equal to the energy radiated classically in the corresponding trajectory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Random-phase approximation and its applications in computational chemistry and materials science
Ren, X., Rinke, P., Joas, C., & Scheffler, M. (2012) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6570-4 · Cited by 610
Feynman and the visualization of space-time processes
Schweber, S. S. (1986) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.58.449 · Cited by 161
Asymptotic behavior of massless fields and the memory effect
Satishchandran, G., & Wald, R. M. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.084007 · Cited by 81
IR renormalization of general effective actions and Hawking flux in 2D gravity theories
Hofmann, D., & Kummer, W. (2006) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02553-3 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloch, F., & Nordsieck, A.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1937-07-15
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 54-59
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2228257988
- Cited by
- 1,265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.