On gaseous self-diffusion in long capillary tubes
Abstract
A calculation is made of the rate of diffusion of "tagged" molecules in a pure gas at uniform pressure in a long capillary tube of half-length $L$ and radius $a$. At pressures for which the mean free path $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gg}a$, the result in the limit $L\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$ reduces to that already obtained by M. Knudsen, the diffusion coefficient $D$ being given by $\frac{2a\overline{v}}{3}$, where $\overline{v}$ is the mean molecular speed. For a capillary of finite length the diffusion coefficient is, to first order in $\frac{a}{L}$, smaller than this by a factor $1\ensuremath{-}\frac{3a}{4L}$. In the opposite limit of high pressures, for which $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\ll}a$, the result reduces to the elementary kinetic theory expression for the self diffusion coefficient, $D=\frac{\ensuremath{\lambda}\overline{v}}{3}$. One of the most significant features of the result is that in a long tube the diffusion coefficient drops very rapidly with increasing pressure from its initial value for $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gg}L$. Thus the initial slope of $D$ as a function of pressure is given by $\frac{\mathrm{dD}}{d(\frac{a}{\ensuremath{\lambda}})}\ensuremath{\cong}\ensuremath{-}\frac{1}{2}\overline{v}a \frac{\mathrm{ln}L}{a}$. It is shown that these results account for the anomalous low pressure minima observed by several investigators who have measured the specific flow $\frac{G}{\ensuremath{\Delta}p}$ through long capill…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The continuum and Knudsen contributions to gas conductivity can be treated as resistances in series and combined using the Bosanquet formula.
“When both contributions are significant, it is found empirically that they can be treated as resistances in series and the combined effect is expressed using the Bosanquet formula [68,72] as follows:”
From Effective thermal conductivity of insulation materials for cryogenic LH2 storage tanks: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [68]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effective thermal conductivity of insulation materials for cryogenic LH2 storage tanks: A review
Ratnakar, R. R., Sun, Z., & Balakotaiah, V. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.130 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pollard, W. G., & Present, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1948-04-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 762-774
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2002750099
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Diffusion Coefficients in Liquids
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
- Keywords
- diffusion coefficient, mean free path, Knudsen diffusion, pressure dependence of diffusion, porous media, kinetic theory of gases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review