Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nuclear Constitution and the Interpretation of Fission Phenomena

Hill, David Lawrence, Wheeler, John Archibald·1953·Physical Review

Abstract

An attempt is made to correlate in a unified picture the features of the empirical evidence on nuclear constitution, some of which appear to require for their explanation the liquid drop model as others require the independent particle picture. As an idealized and exploratory basis for an inclusive description, the extreme saturation assumption has been adopted: potential on a typical nucleon in the nuclear interior nearly independent of the position of the other nucleons, this potential falling off in a small distance at the nuclear surface. In the resulting collective model of the nucleus a distinction is made between the nucleonic state of the system---as defined by the states occupied by the individual nucleons---and the state of vibration and rotation of the nucleus as a whole. On quantum-mechanical grounds it is shown how the kinetic energy of this motion receives an explanation in terms of the degrees of freedom of the individual particles. As in the electronic-vibrational-rotational description of molecular constitution, so in the case of the nucleus it is reasonable to think of the sums of the energies of the individual particle states, plus the sum of the interaction energies, as defining a potential energy of deformation as a function of the shape of the system. Different states of the totality of individual particles give rise to different potential energy surfaces. A given sheet touches one of the surfaces immediately above or below it only at certain isolated "funnels" as in the case of polyatomic molecules. For full validity of the collective model it is necessary that nonadiabatic transitions from one surface to another occur infrequently compared to the frequency of rotation and capillary oscillations, so that these collective motions have a well-defined existence. The mathematical consequences of the collective model have not been explored fully enough to tell whether this condition of self-consistency is fulfilled well or very roughly or not at all for any given excitation energy. The vibrational freuencies correspond in general terms to those predicted by the simple liquid drop model, with, however, certain characteristic quantum mechanical differences. Instances of the Franck-Condon principle have to be accepted, analogous to those in the molecular case. Discussed are some consequences of the collective model or of its liquid drop simplification for energy levels, compatibility of strong neutron capture with individual particle effects in binding, quadrupole moments, alpha-decay, fission thresholds, photofission, spontaneous fission, asymmetry in nuclear fission, hydrodynamics of the division process, fission alpha-particles, and fragment excitation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.89.1102

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 2,166

Metadata

Authors
Hill, D. L., & Wheeler, J. A.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1953-03-01
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
1102-1145
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072225793
Cited by
2,166
References
1
FWCI
20.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nuclear Constitution and the Interpretation of Fission Phenomena. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.89.1102
The paper
Hill, D. L., & Wheeler, J. A. (1953). Nuclear Constitution and the Interpretation of Fission Phenomena. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.89.1102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.