The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Collective Description of Electron Interactions: III. Coulomb Interactions in a Degenerate Electron Gas
Abstract
The behavior of the electrons in a dense electron gas is analyzed quantum-mechanically by a series of canonical transformations. The usual Hamiltonian corresponding to a system of individual electrons with Coulomb interactions is first re-expressed in such a way that the long-range part of the Coulomb interactions between the electrons is described in terms of collective fields, representing organized "plasma" oscillation of the system as a whole. The Hamiltonian then describes these collective fields plus a set of individual electrons which interact with the collective fields and with one another via short-range screened Coulomb interactions. There is, in addition, a set of subsidiary conditions on the system wave function which relate the field and particle variables. The field-particle interaction is eliminated to a high degree of approximation by a further canonical transformation to a new representation in which the Hamiltonian describes independent collective fields, with ${n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ degrees of freedom, plus the system of electrons interacting via screened Coulomb forces with a range of the order of the inter electronic distance. The new subsidiary conditions act only on the electronic wave functions; they strongly inhibit long wavelength electronic density fluctuations and act to reduce the number of individual electronic degrees of freedom by ${n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$. The general properties of this system are discussed, and the methods and results obtained are related to the classical density fluctuation approach and Tomonaga's one-dimensional treatment of the degenerate Fermi gas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Magnetism from conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena
Pendry, J. B., Holden, A. J., Robbins, D. J., & Stewart, W. J. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/22.798002 · Cited by 8,786
Validity of many-body approximation methods for a solvable model
Lipkin, H. J., Meshkov, N., & Glick, A. J. (1965) · Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/0029-5582(65)90862-x · Cited by 1,504
Random-Phase Approximation in the Theory of Superconductivity
Anderson, P. W. (1958) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.112.1900 · Cited by 1,381
Stretched exponential relaxation in molecular and electronic glasses
Phillips, J. C. (1996) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/59/9/003 · Cited by 938
X-ray Thomson scattering in high energy density plasmas
Glenzer, S. H., & Redmer, R. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1625 · Cited by 740
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohm, D., & Pines, D.
- Venue
- Physical Review
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1953-11-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 609-625
- ISSN
- 0031-899X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049484999
- Cited by
- 1,911
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Collective Description of Electron Interactions: III. Coulomb Interactions in a Degenerate Electron Gas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.92.609
- The paper
- Bohm, D., & Pines, D. (1953). A Collective Description of Electron Interactions: III. Coulomb Interactions in a Degenerate Electron Gas. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.92.609
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.