Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 752

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrical Properties ofN-Type Germanium

Debye, P. P., Conwell, E. M.·1954·Physical Review

Abstract

Measurements of conductivity and Hall effect from 11\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K to 300\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K on a set of $n$-type germanium samples covering the range from intrinsic to degenerate are reported. The purity and uniformity of the samples and extensiveness of the data permit a more thorough-going comparison with theory than has been possible in previous work.The theory of mobility is reviewed briefly. The treatment of impurity scattering by Brooks and Herring is presented, and their formula for the impurity mobility is used throughout. An analytical formula for obtaining the mobility from lattice and impurity mobilities is included. The effect of electron-electron collisions on the mobility is considered in a qualitative manner.The principal conclusions concerning the mobility are as follows: (1) Over the range 20.4\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K to 300\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K the lattice mobility varies as ${T}^{\ensuremath{-}1.64}$ rather than the theoretically predicted ${T}^{\ensuremath{-}1.5}$. (2) The impurity mobility increases with temperature less rapidly than the theoretical formula predicts, the exponent of $T$ in the numerator being apparently between 1.0 and 1.5. (3) The Erginsoy formula for neutral impurity scattering appears to fit the experimental data reasonably well for a value of effective mass about one-third the free electron mass. (4) Dislocation scattering is negligible, leading to the conclusion that the density of edge-type dislocations is less than ${10}^{6}$/${\mathrm{cm}}^{2}$.In fitting the concentration data, the parameters involved are activation energy, acceptor concentration, and effective mass. An effective mass in the neighborhood of one-quarter the free electron mass gives the best fit for all samples. The values of acceptor concentration obtained in this way for this effective mass agree well with those calculated from the low-temperature mobility values. The activation energy obtained for the purer samples is 0.0125 ev, in agreement with the value calculated from the hydrogen-like model for one-quarter the free electron mass.The variation of activation energy with concentration does not agree with that observed by Pearson and Bardeen for $p$-type silicon. The effects which have been proposed to explain the variation are: residual potential energy of attraction between free electrons and ionized donors, screening of trapping centers by the free electrons, polarization of neutral centers by free electrons. It is concluded that a combination of the three effects will probably be required to explain the results.The ratio of Hall to drift mobility is shown to agree with the theoretically predicted value within about 10 percent in the range 78\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K to 300\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}K.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.93.693

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 752

Metadata

Authors
Debye, P. P., & Conwell, E. M.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1954-02-15
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
693-706
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045115530
Cited by
752
References
0
FWCI
25.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrical Properties ofN-Type Germanium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.93.693
The paper
Debye, P. P., & Conwell, E. M. (1954). Electrical Properties ofN-Type Germanium. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.93.693

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.