Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,049

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atomic Theory of the Two-Fluid Model of Liquid Helium

Feynman, R. P.·1954·Physical Review

Abstract

It is argued that the wave function representing an excitation in liquid helium should be nearly of the form $\ensuremath{\Sigma}{i}^{}f({\mathrm{r}}_{i})\ensuremath{\varphi}$, where $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ is the ground-state wave function, $f(\mathrm{r})$ is some function of position, and the sum is taken over each atom $i$. In the variational principle this trial function minimizes the energy if $f(\mathrm{r})=\mathrm{exp}(i\mathrm{k}\ifmmode\cdot\else\textperiodcentered\fi{}\mathrm{r})$, the energy value being $E(k)=\frac{{\ensuremath{\hbar}}^{2}{k}^{2}}{2mS(k)}$, where $S(k)$ is the structure factor of the liquid for neutron scattering. For small $k$, $E$ rises linearly (phonons). For larger $k$, $S(k)$ has a maximum which makes a ring in the diffraction pattern and a minimum in the $E(k)$ vs $k$ curve. Near the minimum, $E(k)$ behaves as $\ensuremath{\Delta}+\frac{{\ensuremath{\hbar}}^{2}{(k\ensuremath{-}{k}_{0})}^{2}}{2\ensuremath{\mu}}$, which form Landau found agrees with the data on specific heat. The theoretical value of $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ is twice too high, however, indicating need of a better trial function.Excitations near the minimum are shown to behave in all essential ways like the rotons postulated by Landau. The thermodynamic and hydrodynamic equations of the two-fluid model are discussed from this view. The view is not adequate to deal with the details of the $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ transition and with problems of critical flow velocity.In a dilute solution of ${\mathrm{He}}^{3}$ atoms in ${\mathrm{He}}^{4}$, the ${\mathrm{He}}^{3}$ should move essentially as free particles but of higher effective mass. This mass is calculated, in an appendix, to be about six atomic mass units.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.94.262

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. A. Bijl, 1940, Physica, 7, 869, 10.1016/0031-8914(40)90166-5 · doi:10.1016/0031-8914(40)90166-5
  2. J. Reekie, 1953, Phys. Rev., 92, 827, 10.1103/PhysRev.92.827.2 · doi:10.1103/physrev.92.827.2
  3. D. G. Henshaw, 1953, Phys. Rev., 91, 1222, 10.1103/PhysRev.91.1222 · doi:10.1103/physrev.91.1222
  4. L. Landau, 1941, J. Phys. U.S.S.R., 5, 71
  5. L. Landau, 1941, J. Phys. U.S.S.R., 8, 1
  6. R. B. Dingle, 1952, Phil. Mag., 1, 112
  7. L. Landau, 1947, J. Phys. U.S.S.R., 11, 91
  8. L. Landau, 1949, Phys. Rev., 75, 884, 10.1103/PhysRev.75.884 · doi:10.1103/physrev.75.884
  9. L. Landau, 1949, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.), 19, 637
  10. F. London, 1950, Superfluids
  11. J. G. Daunt, 1952, Advance in Physics (Phil. Mag. Supplement), 6, 258

Cited by

See all 1,049

Metadata

Authors
Feynman, R. P.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1954-04-15
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
262-277
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047968614
Cited by
1,049
References
3
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.