Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 607

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electronic Polarizabilities of Ions from the Hartree-Fock Wave Functions

Sternheimer, R. M.·1954·Physical Review

Abstract

The electronic polarizability $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ has been calculated for several ions by obtaining the perturbation of the wave functions by an external field from a numerical solution of the differential equation satisfied by the perturbation. For the helium-like ions an analytic solution was obtained by using the wave functions of L\"owdin. The calculated values of $\ensuremath{\alpha}$ are, in general, between 1 and 1.5 times the observed values. For several ions values have been calculated for the quadrupole polarizability which measures the quadrupole moment induced in the ion by an external charge. The effect of the dipole moment induced in the ion on the electric field at the nucleus is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrev.96.951

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 607

Metadata

Authors
Sternheimer, R. M.
Venue
Physical Review
Published
1954-11-15
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
951-968
ISSN
0031-899X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055698188
Cited by
607
References
0
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic Polarizabilities of Ions from the Hartree-Fock Wave Functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrev.96.951
The paper
Sternheimer, R. M. (1954). Electronic Polarizabilities of Ions from the Hartree-Fock Wave Functions. Physical Review. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.96.951

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.