Cited by 3Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Experimental detection of quantum steerability based on the critical radius in an all-optical system

Fan, Xiao-Gang, Zhao, Fa, Yang, Huan, Ding, Zhi-Yong, Wang, Dong, Ye, Liu·2023·Physical Review A

Abstract

Quantum steering is the ability that one system affects another one without delay by performing local measurements. During the past few years, the research on quantum steering has been verified in a number of experiments by the choices of measurements. But this research cannot detect all steerable states. Recently, the definition of critical radius was proposed by Nguyen et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 240401 (2019)]. The critical radius can detect all steerable states for two-qubit states. Therefore the critical radius can be regarded as the best method for detecting the steerability of two-qubit states. However, relevant experimental research is still lacking. In this work, for comparison, we experimentally investigate three steering criteria based on the critical radius, the geometric Bell-like inequality, and the three-setting measurements steering inequality and find that the critical radius can detect the most steerable states. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the critical radius satisfies the scaling property. The results show that we only need to calculate the critical radii of some quantum states to obtain the critical radii of more scaling quantum states. Thus this property can provide the convenience for detecting the steerability of many quantum states.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.107.012419

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors of Ref.47 used a setup introducing losses and measured elements of a correlation matrix to determine the steering indicators.

    “The authors used a setup introducing losses and measured elements of a correlation matrix to determine the steering indicators.”
  • The scaling property of the critical steering radius allows classifying various families of quantum states as steerable or non-steerable.

    “Its scaling property allows classifying as steerable or non-steerable various families of quantum states.”
  • A very recent Ref.47 showed experimentally that a critical steering radius is the most powerful among practical steering indicators.

    “We note a very recent Ref.47, where it was shown experimentally that a critical steering radius is the most powerful among practical steering indicators.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, X.-G., Zhao, F., Yang, H., Ding, Z.-Y., Wang, D., & Ye, L.
Affiliations
  • Anhui University (CN)
  • West Anhui University (CN)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2023-01-20
Volume
107
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 2469-9926
  • 2469-9934
OpenAlex
W4317543130
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (12175001, 12075001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
critical radius, two-qubit states, scaling behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review