Experimental detection of quantum steerability based on the critical radius in an all-optical system
Abstract
Quantum steering is the ability that one system affects another one without delay by performing local measurements. During the past few years, the research on quantum steering has been verified in a number of experiments by the choices of measurements. But this research cannot detect all steerable states. Recently, the definition of critical radius was proposed by Nguyen et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 240401 (2019)]. The critical radius can detect all steerable states for two-qubit states. Therefore the critical radius can be regarded as the best method for detecting the steerability of two-qubit states. However, relevant experimental research is still lacking. In this work, for comparison, we experimentally investigate three steering criteria based on the critical radius, the geometric Bell-like inequality, and the three-setting measurements steering inequality and find that the critical radius can detect the most steerable states. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the critical radius satisfies the scaling property. The results show that we only need to calculate the critical radii of some quantum states to obtain the critical radii of more scaling quantum states. Thus this property can provide the convenience for detecting the steerability of many quantum states.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors of Ref.47 used a setup introducing losses and measured elements of a correlation matrix to determine the steering indicators.
“The authors used a setup introducing losses and measured elements of a correlation matrix to determine the steering indicators.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
The scaling property of the critical steering radius allows classifying various families of quantum states as steerable or non-steerable.
“Its scaling property allows classifying as steerable or non-steerable various families of quantum states.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
A very recent Ref.47 showed experimentally that a critical steering radius is the most powerful among practical steering indicators.
“We note a very recent Ref.47, where it was shown experimentally that a critical steering radius is the most powerful among practical steering indicators.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J., & White, A. G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 · Cited by 2,176 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography
Abo, S., Soubusta, J., Jiráková, K., Bartkiewicz, K., Černoch, A., Lemr, K., & Miranowicz, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-35015-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“[46], where it was shown experimentally that a critical steering radius is the most powerful among practical steering indicators.”
Background
- Authors
- Fan, X.-G., Zhao, F., Yang, H., Ding, Z.-Y., Wang, D., & Ye, L.
- Affiliations
- Anhui University (CN)
- West Anhui University (CN)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2023-01-20
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 2469-9926
- 2469-9934
- OpenAlex
- W4317543130
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (12175001, 12075001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- critical radius, two-qubit states, scaling behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review