Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,603

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of an intense electromagnetic field on a weakly bound system

Reiss, Howard R.·1980·Physical Review A

Abstract

The approximation method introduced by Keldysh is revised and extended. The technique is applicable to the photodetachment by a plane-wave field of an electron bound by a short-range potential. The approximation is to neglect the effect of the binding potential as compared to the field effects on the final state of the detached electron. By choice of a different gauge than that used by Keldysh, the formalism becomes very simple and tractable. A general basis for the formalism is developed, and it is then applied to find transition probabilities for any order of interaction for both linearly and circularly polarized plane-wave fields. The low-intensity, first-order limit and the high-intensity, high-order limit yield the correct results. Two intensity parameters are identified. The fundamental one is $z=\frac{{e}^{2}{a}^{2}}{4m\ensuremath{\omega}}$, where $a$ is the magnitude of the vector potential (in radiation gauge) of the field of circular frequency $\ensuremath{\omega}$. The second parameter is ${z}_{1}=\frac{2z\ensuremath{\omega}}{{E}_{B}}$, where ${E}_{B}$ is binding energy, and it becomes important only in the asymptotic case. With the assumption that the field leaves the neutral atomic core relatively unaffected, the formalism is applied to the example of the negative hydrogen ion irradiated by circularly or linearly polarized 10.6-\ensuremath{\mu}m radiation. Photodetachment angular distributions and total transition probabilities are examined for explicit intensity effects. It is found that total transition probability $W$ is not sensitive to intensity since $\frac{d(logW)}{d}$ ($logz$) retains low-intensity straight-line behavior up to quite high values of $z$. An important intensity effect is the major significance of higher-than-lowest-order terms when $z$ is large, especially for circular polarization. A sensitive indicator of intensity is the ratio of photodetachment probabilities in circularly and linearly polarized fields, which increases sharply with intensity. An investigation of the convergence of perturbation expansions gives the upper limit $z<[\frac{{E}_{B}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}]\ensuremath{-}\frac{{E}_{B}}{\ensuremath{\omega}}$, where the square bracket means "smallest integer containing" the quantity in brackets. This limit is $z<0.59$ for ${\mathrm{H}}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ in 10.6-\ensuremath{\mu}m radiation. The failure of perturbation theory is not necessarily manifest in qualitative ways. For example, it is not apparent in total photoelectron yield as a function of intensity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.22.1786

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,603

Metadata

Authors
Reiss, H. R.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1980-11-01
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
1786-1813
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083095544
Cited by
1,603
References
0
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of an intense electromagnetic field on a weakly bound system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.22.1786
The paper
Reiss, H. R. (1980). Effect of an intense electromagnetic field on a weakly bound system. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.22.1786

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.