The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generation of squeezed states via degenerate four-wave mixing
Abstract
A microscopic model of degenerate four-wave mixing including the quantization of the medium is given. Thus the full effects of loss and spontaneous emission on the squeezing attainable are analyzed. We examine separately the squeezing in the output fields for counterpropagating four-wave mixing, copropagating four-wave mixing, and four-wave mixing in a single-ended optical ring cavity. Good squeezing is possible only in certain limits of atomic parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Metadata
- Authors
- Reid, M. D., & Walls, D. F.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1985-03-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1622-1635
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988884658
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generation of squeezed states via degenerate four-wave mixing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.31.1622
- The paper
- Reid, M. D., & Walls, D. F. (1985). Generation of squeezed states via degenerate four-wave mixing. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.31.1622
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
