The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Anisotropic scattering of electrons byN2and its effect on electron transport
Abstract
As part of a systematic study of approximations commonly made in solutions of the Boltzmann equation for electrons in molecular gases, we have investigated the effects of anisotropic scattering on electron transport coefficients in ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ and have extended our study of the multiterm expansion technique to higher E/n. A critical survey of published data yields a set of differential and integral cross sections for electron energies from 0.003 to ${10}^{4}$ eV. For electric-field--to--gas-density ratios E/n between 10 and 500 Td (1 Td${=10}^{\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}21}$ V ${\mathrm{m}}^{2}$), the changes in the commonly measured transport and reaction coefficients resulting from the introduction of anisotropic elastic and inelastic scattering, while keeping the elastic momentum-transfer cross section constant, are less than 1%.These calculations were made with use of the multiterm spherical-harmonic expansion solution of the Boltzmann equation. For 500 25%) at our highest E/n. The calculated transport coefficients are in generally good agreement with experiment for E/n less than 300 Td, but the differences increase at higher E/n. The importance of proper interpretation of ionization and excitation experiments at high E/n is illustrated by calculations which model either an exponential growth of density in time or an exponential growth with position. The calculated ionization coefficients are low compared to most experiments for E/n less than 200 Td. At E/n>600 Td the agreement is good for the spatial growth experiments, but the calculated values are below experiment from the temporal growth experiments. The calculated excitation coefficients are generally higher than experiment at low and high E/n but in agreement with experiment at E/n near 150 Td.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hagelaar, G. J. M., & Pitchford, L. C. (2005) · Plasma Sources Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0963-0252/14/4/011 · Cited by 3,422
Self-citationFast gas heating in a nitrogen–oxygen discharge plasma: I. Kinetic mechanism
Popov, N. A. (2011) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/44/28/285201 · Cited by 403
Carbone, E., Graef, W., Hagelaar, G., Boer, D., Hopkins, M. M., Stephens, J. C., Yee, B. T., Pancheshnyi, S., van Dijk, J., & Pitchford, L. (2021) · Atoms · doi:10.3390/atoms9010016 · Cited by 177
Self-citationComputational Study of Hall-Effect Thruster with Ambient Atmospheric Gas as Propellant
Garrigues, L. (2012) · Journal of Propulsion and Power · doi:10.2514/1.b34307 · Cited by 33
Evaluation of angular scattering models for electron-neutral collisions in Monte Carlo simulations
Janssen, J. F. J., Pitchford, L. C., Hagelaar, G. J. M., & van Dijk, J. (2016) · Plasma Sources Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0963-0252/25/5/055026 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Phelps, A. V., & Pitchford, L. C.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1985-05-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2932-2949
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022375179
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anisotropic scattering of electrons byN2and its effect on electron transport. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.31.2932
- The paper
- Phelps, A. V., & Pitchford, L. C. (1985). Anisotropic scattering of electrons byN2and its effect on electron transport. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.31.2932
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.