Cited by 1,955

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Input and output in damped quantum systems: Quantum stochastic differential equations and the master equation

Gardiner, C. W., Collett, M. J.·1985·Physical Review A

Abstract

We develop a formulation of quantum damping theory in which the explicit nature of inputs from a heat bath, and of outputs into it, is taken into account. Quantum Langevin equations are developed, in which the Langevin forces are the field operators corresponding to the input modes. Time-reversed equations exist in which the Langevin forces are the output modes, and the sign of damping is reversed. Causality and boundary conditions relating inputs to system variables are developed. The concept of ``quantum white noise'' is formulated, and the formal relationship between quantum Langevin equations and quantum stochastic differential equations (SDE's) is established. In analogy to the classical formulation, there are two kinds of SDE's: the Ito and the Stratonovich forms. Rules are developed for converting from one to the other. These rules depend on the nature of the quantum white noise, which may be squeezed. The SDE's developed are shown to be exactly equivalent to quantum master equations, and rules are developed for computing multitime-ordered correlation functions with use of the appropriate master equation. With use of the causality and boundary conditions, the relationship between correlation functions of the output and those of the system and the input is developed. It is possible to calculate what kind of output statistics result, provided that one knows the input statistics and provided that one can compute the system correlation functions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.31.3761

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. S. S. Schweber, 1961, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory
  2. C. M. Caves, 1982, Phys. Rev. D, 26, 1817, 10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1817 · DOI
  3. H. J. Kimble, 1978, Phys. Rev. A, 18, 201, 10.1103/PhysRevA.18.201 · DOI
  4. H. J. Carmichael, 1976, J. Phys. B, 9, 143
  5. C. M. Gardiner, 1984, Opt. Commun., 50, 173, 10.1016/0030-4018(84)90342-0 · DOI
  6. B. Yurke, 1984, Phys. Rev. A, 29, 1419, 10.1103/PhysRevA.29.1419 · DOI
  7. M. Lax, 1966, Phys. Rev., 145, 110, 10.1103/PhysRev.145.110 · DOI
  8. W.H. Louisell, 1973, Quantum Statistical Properties of Radiation
  9. W. Weidlich, 1967, Z. Phys., 201, 369, 10.1007/BF01326573 · DOI
  10. W. Weidlich, 1967, Z. Phys., 204, 223, 10.1007/BF01326197 · DOI
  11. F. Haake, 1973, Quantum Statistics in Optics and Solid-State Physics, Vol. 66 of Springer Tracts in Modern Physics
  12. G. S. Agarwal, 1974, Quantum Optics, Vol. 70 of Springer Tracts in Modern Physics
  13. M. Sargent, 1974, Laser Physics
  14. E. B. Davies, 1976, Quantum Theory of Open Systems
  15. H. Spohn, 1980, Rev. Mod. Phys., 52, 569, 10.1103/RevModPhys.52.569 · DOI · Paper page
  16. H. Haken, 1970, Light and Matter Ic, Band 25, Teil 2 of Handbuch der Physik
  17. C. W. Gardiner, 1983, Handbook of Stochastic Methods, 10.1007/978-3-662-02377-8 · DOI
  18. M. J. Collett, 1984, Phys. Rev. A, 30, 1386, 10.1103/PhysRevA.30.1386 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,955

Metadata

Authors
Gardiner, C. W., & Collett, M. J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1985-06-01
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
3761-3774
ISSN
0556-2791
Cited by
1,955
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review