Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experimental determination of the random-parking limit in two dimensions

Onoda, George Y., Liniger, Eric G.·1986·Physical Review A

Abstract

The two-dimensional random-parking limit is the area fraction of a plane covered by circles when the circles are added sequentially in a random way, without overlap, until no further circles can be added. As yet, no analytical solution exists for this limit. Several computer simulations and one experimental study have been carried out in the past, with results varying from 50% to 62% for the parking limit. In our work, we carry out an experimental determination of this parking limit, utilizing a spherical colloid that sticks irreversibly to a flat substrate. The experimental value obtained is 0.55\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.01, which agrees with two of the most recent, computer-generated values.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.33.715

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Onoda, G. Y., & Liniger, E. G.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1986-01-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
715-716
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094686579
Cited by
201
References
0
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental determination of the random-parking limit in two dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.33.715
The paper
Onoda, G. Y., & Liniger, E. G. (1986). Experimental determination of the random-parking limit in two dimensions. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.33.715

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.