Cited by 138Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantum optical test of observation and complementarity in quantum mechanics

Scully, Marlan O., Walther, Herbert·1989·Physical Review A

Abstract

We propose and analyze experiments designed to probe the way in which the measurement process (the presence of a detector) influences the investigated system. These experiments are based on the fact that number states of the radiation field can be generated by the use of the micromaser and cavity quantum electrodynamics. It is shown that ``which-path'' (particle) information rules out interference (wave) effects due to the system-detector correlations and not due to a randomization of phase. Specific experiments based on neutron interferometry and quantum-beat techniques taken together with the micromaser are suggested and analyzed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.39.5229

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. W. E. Lamb, Jr., 1969, Phys. Today, 22, 23
  2. M. Jammer, 1979, Phys. Rev. D, 19, 473, 10.1103/PhysRevD.19.473 · DOI
  3. W. Heisenberg, 1930, Die Physikalischen Prinzipien der Quantentheorie
  4. B. Englert, 1988, Found. Phys., 18, 1045, 10.1007/BF01909939 · DOI
  5. J. Schwinger, 1988, Z. Phys. D, 10, 135, 10.1007/BF01384847 · DOI
  6. D. Meschede, 1985, Phys. Rev. Lett., 54, 551, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.551 · DOI
  7. S. Haroche, 1985, Adv. At. Mol. Phys., 20, 350
  8. J. A. C. Gallas, 1985, Adv. At. Mol. Phys., 20, 414
  9. L. Mandel, 1982, Phys. Lett., 89A, 325, 10.1016/0375-9601(82)90183-9 · DOI
  10. J. Krause, 1987, Phys. Rev. A, 36, 4547, 10.1103/PhysRevA.36.4547 · DOI
  11. J. Krause, 1988, Phys. Rev. A, 39, 1915, 10.1103/PhysRevA.39.1915 · DOI
  12. G. Badurek, 1986, Phys. Rev. A, 34, 2600, 10.1103/PhysRevA.34.2600 · DOI
  13. M. Born, 1980, Principles of Optics, 6th ed.
  14. R. Glauber, 1964, Quantum Optics and Electronics, 1964 Les Houches Summer Lectures
  15. E. Hahn, 1950, Phys. Rev., 80, 580, 10.1103/PhysRev.80.580 · DOI
  16. S. McCall, 1969, Phys. Rev., 183, 457, 10.1103/PhysRev.183.457 · DOI
  17. W. Chow, 1975, Phys. Rev. A, 11, 1380, 10.1103/PhysRevA.11.1380 · DOI
  18. G. Leuchs, 1979, Laser Spectroscopy IV, Vol. 21 of Springer Series in Optical Sciences
  19. G. Leuchs, 1979, Z. Phys. A, 293, 93, 10.1007/BF01559750 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Scully, M. O., & Walther, H.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1989-05-01
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
5229-5236
ISSN
0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041410197
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
quantum measurement, complementarity, which-path information, wave-particle duality, micromaser, cavity quantum electrodynamics, Fock states, neutron interferometry, quantum beats, interference suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review