The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Observation of fractional revivals in the evolution of a Rydberg atomic wave packet
Abstract
Rydberg atomic wave packets have demonstrated striking classical properties. In particular, the wave packets display regions in which they evolve like classical atoms. However, between these regions the wave packet is dispersed and its evolution departs from the classical model. In these nonclassical regions, the wave packet can either be dispersed or coalesced into a number of equally spaced sub-wave-packets. The regions in which the sub-wave-packets appear have come to be known as fractional revivals. This paper reports the observation of these fractional revivals and discusses their implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Robinett, R. (2004) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2003.11.002 · Cited by 532
Wave Packet Isotope Separation
Averbukh, I. S., Vrakking, M. J. J., Villeneuve, D. M., & Stolow, A. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3518 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeazell, J. A., & Stroud, C. R.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1991-05-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5153-5156
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2057687570
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observation of fractional revivals in the evolution of a Rydberg atomic wave packet. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.43.5153
- The paper
- Yeazell, J. A., & Stroud, C. R. (1991). Observation of fractional revivals in the evolution of a Rydberg atomic wave packet. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.43.5153
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
