Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,553

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recovery of the Navier-Stokes equations using a lattice-gas Boltzmann method

Chen, Hudong, Chen, Shiyi, Matthaeus, William H.·1992·Physical Review A

Abstract

It is known that the Frisch-Hasslacher-Pomeau lattice-gas automaton model and related models possess some rather unphysical effects. These are (1) a non-Galilean invariance caused by a density-dependent coefficient in the convection term, and (2) a velocity-dependent equation of state. In this paper, we show that both of these effects can be eliminated exactly in a lattice Boltzmann-equation model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.45.r5339

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,553

Metadata

Authors
Chen, H., Chen, S., & Matthaeus, W. H.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
R5339-R5342
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2021035369
Cited by
1,553
References
0
FWCI
20.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recovery of the Navier-Stokes equations using a lattice-gas Boltzmann method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.45.r5339
The paper
Chen, H., Chen, S., & Matthaeus, W. H. (1992). Recovery of the Navier-Stokes equations using a lattice-gas Boltzmann method. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.45.r5339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.