The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experiments and simulations of tunnel-ionized plasmas
Abstract
The tunneling-ionization model predicts that fully ionized plasmas with controllable perpendicular (${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\perp}}}$) and negligible longitudinal temperature (${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$) can be produced. The validity of these predictions has been studied through experiments and supporting theory and simulations. Emission of odd harmonics of the laser frequency, indicative of a stepwise ionization process, has been observed. X-ray measurements show that the plasma temperature is higher for a circularly polarized laser-produced plasma compared to when linear polarization is used. Analytically we find that the growth of the stimulated Raman (SRS) and Compton scattering (SCS) instabilities are suppressed during the ionization phase. A higher ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$ than expected from the single-particle-tunneling model was observed after the ionization phase through SCS fluctuation spectra. The maximum achievable plasma density is found to be limited by ionization induced refraction. One-dimensional (1D) simulations show that, after the ionization phase, the initial ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$ is low as expected from the single particle model and SRS density fluctuations grow to large values. In 2D simulations, however, ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$ at the end of the ionization phase is already much higher and only SCS is seen to grow. The simulations indicate that stochastic heating and the Weibel instability play an important role in plasma heating in all directions and in making the plasma isotropic. Two-dimensional simulations also confirm that refraction plays a crucial role in determining the maximum electron density that can be obtained in such plasmas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tajima, T., & Dawson, J. M. (1979) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.267 · Cited by 4,705
Cited by
Overview of plasma-based accelerator concepts
Esarey, E., Sprangle, P., Krall, J., & Ting, A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · doi:10.1109/27.509991 · Cited by 1,238
Self-focusing and guiding of short laser pulses in ionizing gases and plasmas
Esarey, E., Sprangle, P., Krall, J., & Ting, A. (1997) · IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/3.641305 · Cited by 500
Short-pulse laser - plasma interactions
Gibbon, P., & Förster, E. (1996) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/38/6/001 · Cited by 411
Clayton, C. E., Marsh, K. A., Dyson, A., Everett, M., Lal, A., Leemans, W. P., Williams, R., & Joshi, C. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.37 · Cited by 349
Self-citationEnvelope analysis of intense laser pulse self-modulation in plasmas
Esarey, E., Krall, J., & Sprangle, P. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.2887 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Leemans, W. P., Clayton, C. E., Mori, W. B., Marsh, K. A., Kaw, P. K., Dyson, A., Joshi, C., & Wallace, J. M.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1091-1105
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2050804368
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiments and simulations of tunnel-ionized plasmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.46.1091
- The paper
- Leemans, W. P., Clayton, C. E., Mori, W. B., Marsh, K. A., Kaw, P. K., Dyson, A., Joshi, C., & Wallace, J. M. (1992). Experiments and simulations of tunnel-ionized plasmas. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.46.1091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.