Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experiments and simulations of tunnel-ionized plasmas

Leemans, W. P., Clayton, C. E., Mori, W. B., Marsh, K. A., Kaw, P. K., Dyson, A., Joshi, C., Wallace, J. M.·1992·Physical Review A

Abstract

The tunneling-ionization model predicts that fully ionized plasmas with controllable perpendicular (${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\perp}}}$) and negligible longitudinal temperature (${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$) can be produced. The validity of these predictions has been studied through experiments and supporting theory and simulations. Emission of odd harmonics of the laser frequency, indicative of a stepwise ionization process, has been observed. X-ray measurements show that the plasma temperature is higher for a circularly polarized laser-produced plasma compared to when linear polarization is used. Analytically we find that the growth of the stimulated Raman (SRS) and Compton scattering (SCS) instabilities are suppressed during the ionization phase. A higher ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$ than expected from the single-particle-tunneling model was observed after the ionization phase through SCS fluctuation spectra. The maximum achievable plasma density is found to be limited by ionization induced refraction. One-dimensional (1D) simulations show that, after the ionization phase, the initial ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$ is low as expected from the single particle model and SRS density fluctuations grow to large values. In 2D simulations, however, ${\mathit{T}}_{\mathrm{\ensuremath{\parallel}}}$ at the end of the ionization phase is already much higher and only SCS is seen to grow. The simulations indicate that stochastic heating and the Weibel instability play an important role in plasma heating in all directions and in making the plasma isotropic. Two-dimensional simulations also confirm that refraction plays a crucial role in determining the maximum electron density that can be obtained in such plasmas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.46.1091

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Leemans, W. P., Clayton, C. E., Mori, W. B., Marsh, K. A., Kaw, P. K., Dyson, A., Joshi, C., & Wallace, J. M.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1992-07-01
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
1091-1105
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2050804368
Cited by
179
References
1
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiments and simulations of tunnel-ionized plasmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.46.1091
The paper
Leemans, W. P., Clayton, C. E., Mori, W. B., Marsh, K. A., Kaw, P. K., Dyson, A., Joshi, C., & Wallace, J. M. (1992). Experiments and simulations of tunnel-ionized plasmas. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.46.1091

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.