The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Binary-encounter-dipole model for electron-impact ionization
Abstract
A theoretical model, which is free of adjustable or fitted parameters, for calculating electron-impact ionization cross sections for atoms and molecules is presented. This model combines the binary-encounter theory with the dipole interaction of the Bethe theory for fast incident electrons. The ratios of the contributions from distant and close collisions and interference between the direct and exchange terms are determined by using the asymptotic behaviors predicted by the Bethe theory for ionization and for stopping cross sections. Our model prescribes procedures to calculate the singly differential cross section (energy distribution) for each subshell using the binding energy, average kinetic energy, and the differential dipole oscillator strengths for that subshell. Then the singly differential cross section is integrated over the ejected electron energy to obtain the total ionization cross section. The resulting total ionization cross section near the threshold is proportional to the excess energy of the projectile electron. We found that this model yields total ionization cross sections for a variety of atoms and molecules from threshold to several keV which are in good agreement (\ensuremath{\sim}10% or better on average) with known experimental results. The energy distributions also exhibit the expected shapes and magnitudes. We offer a simpler version of the model that can be used when differential oscillator strengths are not known. For the ionization of ions with an open-shell configuration, we found that a minor modification of our theory greatly improves agreement with experiment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms
Bethe, H. A., & Salpeter, E. E. (1957) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12869-5 · Cited by 4,758
Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie
Bethe, H. (1930) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19303970303 · Cited by 4,076
Cited by
New model for electron-impact ionization cross sections of molecules
Hwang, W., Kim, Y.-K., & Rudd, M. E. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.471116 · Cited by 586
Self-citationElectron inelastic-scattering cross sections in liquid water
Dingfelder, M., Hantke, D., Inokuti, M., & Paretzke, H. G. (1998) · Radiation Physics and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0969-806x(97)00317-4 · Cited by 302
Electron-impact ionization cross sections of atmospheric molecules
Kim, Y.-K., Hwang, W., Weinberger, N. M., Ali, M. A., & Rudd, M. E. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.473186 · Cited by 259
Self-citationHolste, K., Dietz, P., Scharmann, S., Keil, K., Henning, T., Zschätzsch, D., Reitemeyer, M., Nauschütt, B., Kiefer, F., Kunze, F., et al. (2020) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/5.0010134 · Cited by 207
Jurek, Z., Son, S.-K., Ziaja, B., & Santra, R. (2016) · Journal of Applied Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s1600576716006014 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-K., & Rudd, M. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3954-3967
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1998583834
- Cited by
- 1,022
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binary-encounter-dipole model for electron-impact ionization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.50.3954
- The paper
- Kim, Y.-K., & Rudd, M. E. (1994). Binary-encounter-dipole model for electron-impact ionization. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.50.3954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.