Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Algebraic propagator approaches and intermediate-state representations. I. The biorthogonal and unitary coupled-cluster methods

Mertins, F., Schirmer, J.·1996·Physical Review A

Abstract

As a general common concept, underlying diverse methods used to compute generalized electronic excitations in atoms and molecules, intermediate-state representations (ISR's), are considered and analyzed. Essentially, an ISR results by representing the excitation energy operator in terms of so-called correlated excited states (CES's) or states derived thereof. Three different ISR schemes are compared, namely the biorthogonal coupled-cluster (BCC) representation used in both the coupled-cluster linear response and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods, a unitary coupled-cluster (UCC) representation, and the excitation class orthogonalized (ECO) representation resulting from a Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure for the CES. Moreover, the relationship between the BCC scheme and the symmetry-adapted-cluster--configuration-interaction method is discussed. The relevance of the ISR schemes, as opposed to the much simpler configuration-interaction (CI) expansions, arises from two basic properties referred to as separability and compactness. The former property is a sufficient condition for size-consistent results, while the latter allows one to use smaller explicit configuration spaces than in comparable CI treatments. We show that the ECO and UCC representations are both separable and compact, whereas a somewhat restricted compactness property applies in the BCC case. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.53.2140

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Mertins, F., & Schirmer, J.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1996-04-01
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
2140-2152
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2074581166
Cited by
188
References
0
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Algebraic propagator approaches and intermediate-state representations. I. The biorthogonal and unitary coupled-cluster methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.53.2140
The paper
Mertins, F., & Schirmer, J. (1996). Algebraic propagator approaches and intermediate-state representations. I. The biorthogonal and unitary coupled-cluster methods. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.53.2140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.