The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Algebraic propagator approaches and intermediate-state representations. I. The biorthogonal and unitary coupled-cluster methods
Abstract
As a general common concept, underlying diverse methods used to compute generalized electronic excitations in atoms and molecules, intermediate-state representations (ISR's), are considered and analyzed. Essentially, an ISR results by representing the excitation energy operator in terms of so-called correlated excited states (CES's) or states derived thereof. Three different ISR schemes are compared, namely the biorthogonal coupled-cluster (BCC) representation used in both the coupled-cluster linear response and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods, a unitary coupled-cluster (UCC) representation, and the excitation class orthogonalized (ECO) representation resulting from a Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure for the CES. Moreover, the relationship between the BCC scheme and the symmetry-adapted-cluster--configuration-interaction method is discussed. The relevance of the ISR schemes, as opposed to the much simpler configuration-interaction (CI) expansions, arises from two basic properties referred to as separability and compactness. The former property is a sufficient condition for size-consistent results, while the latter allows one to use smaller explicit configuration spaces than in comparable CI treatments. We show that the ECO and UCC representations are both separable and compact, whereas a somewhat restricted compactness property applies in the BCC case. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
Helgaker, T., Coriani, S., Jørgensen, P., Kristensen, K., Olsen, J., & Ruud, K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2002239 · Cited by 694
Levchenko, S. V., & Krylov, A. I. (2004) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1630018 · Cited by 335
Non-Hermitian electronic theory and applications to clusters
Santra, R., & Cederbaum, L. S. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00143-6 · Cited by 290
New perspectives on unitary coupled‐cluster theory
Taube, A. G., & Bartlett, R. J. (2006) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.21198 · Cited by 254
Valence one-electron and shake-up ionization bands of carbon clusters. II. The Cn (n=4,6,8,10) rings
Deleuze, M. S., Giuffreda, M. G., François, J.-P., & Cederbaum, L. S. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481125 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Mertins, F., & Schirmer, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2140-2152
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2074581166
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Algebraic propagator approaches and intermediate-state representations. I. The biorthogonal and unitary coupled-cluster methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.53.2140
- The paper
- Mertins, F., & Schirmer, J. (1996). Algebraic propagator approaches and intermediate-state representations. I. The biorthogonal and unitary coupled-cluster methods. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.53.2140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.