Cited by 357Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Nonlocality of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen state in the Wigner representation

Open access
Banaszek, Konrad, Wódkiewicz, Krzysztof·1998·Physical Review A

Abstract

We demonstrate that the Wigner function of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen state, though positive definite, provides direct evidence of the nonlocal character of this state. The proof is based on an observation that the Wigner function describes correlations in the joint measurement of the phase-space displaced parity operator.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.58.4345

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For continuous variables like position and momentum, these operators may include parity and two other variables that test even and odd wavefunctions.

    “For continuous variables like position and momentum, these operators may include parity and two other variables that test even and odd wavefunctions [34][35][36][37][38].”

    From Exactly solvable 2D model for photon propagation in curved space: loss of interference and Bell inequality violation (2022) · cites this paper as [34]

    On p. 1, the paper analyzes position–momentum correlations using displaced parity operators. On p. 2, it describes parity measurements as having outcomes of +1 or −1. It does not describe two additional variables that test even and odd wavefunctions. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banaszek, K., & Wódkiewicz, K.
Affiliations
University of Warsaw (PL)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1998-12-01
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
4345-4347
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2073872378
Cited by
357
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, Wigner function, nonlocality, quantum entanglement, joint measurement, quantum correlations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review