Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimization of Gaussian basis sets for density-functional calculations

Porezag, Dirk, Pederson, Mark R.·1999·Physical Review A

Abstract

We introduce a scheme for the optimization of Gaussian basis sets for use in density-functional calculations. It is applicable to both all-electron and pseudopotential methodologies. In contrast to earlier approaches, the number of primitive Gaussians (exponents) used to define the basis functions is not fixed but adjusted, based on a total-energy criterion. Furthermore, all basis functions share the same set of exponents. The numerical results for the scaling of the shortest-range Gaussian exponent as a function of the nuclear charge are explained by analytical derivations. We have generated all-electron basis sets for H, B through F, Al, Si, Mn, and Cu. Our results show that they efficiently and accurately reproduce structural properties and binding energies for a variety of clusters and molecules for both local and gradient-corrected density functionals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.60.2840

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Porezag, D., & Pederson, M. R.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
2840-2847
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2019109263
Cited by
279
References
0
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization of Gaussian basis sets for density-functional calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.60.2840
The paper
Porezag, D., & Pederson, M. R. (1999). Optimization of Gaussian basis sets for density-functional calculations. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.60.2840

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.