Schmidt-number witnesses and bound entanglement
Open accessAbstract
The Schmidt number of a mixed state characterizes the minimum Schmidt rank of the pure states needed to construct it. We investigate the Schmidt number of an arbitrary mixed state by studying Schmidt-number witnesses that detect it. We present a canonical form of such witnesses and provide constructive methods for their optimization. Finally, we present strong evidence that all bound entangled states with positive partial transpose in ${\mathcal{C}}^{3}\ensuremath{\bigotimes}{\mathcal{C}}^{3}$ have Schmidt number 2.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another experimental approach to determine entanglement without QST can be based on measuring a bipartite Schmidt number, which satisfies conditions of a good entanglement measure and can be determined experimentally via a witnessing approach.
“Another experimental approach to determine entanglement of a given state without QST can be based on measuring a bipartite Schmidt number, which satisfies various conditions of a good entanglement measure44,45 and can be determined experimentally via a witnessing approach46.”
From Experimental hierarchy of two-qubit quantum correlations without state tomography (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 233
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [1]D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger (Eds.), 'The Physics of Quantum Information', (Springer, Heidelberg, 2000).
- [3]M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki and R. Horodecki, in 'Quantum Information -Basic Concepts and Experiments' , Eds. G. Alber and M. Weiner, in print (Springer, Berlin, 2000).
- [17](a) M. Lewenstein et al. , quant-ph/0005112; (b) M. Lewenstein et al. , quant-ph/0005014, Phys. Rev. A XXX (2000). · arXiv
- [22](a) C. H. Bennett et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 , 5385 (1999); (b) D. Bruß and A. Peres, Phys. Rev. A 61 , 30301(R) (2000); (c) P. Horodecki and M. Lewenstein, quant-ph/0001035, Phys. Rev. Lett 85 , 2657 (2000). · arXiv
- Authors
- Sanpera, A., Bruß, D., & Lewenstein, M.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2001-04-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1982683415
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- Schmidt number, bound entanglement, mixed states, positive partial transpose, Schmidt rank
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review