The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imperfect detectors in linear optical quantum computers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the KLM scheme, a gate teleportation fidelity better than 99% requires detectors with an efficiency η > 0.999987.
“Its effect on the original teleportation component in the KLM protocol was studied by Glancy et al. (2002), who found that in the KLM scheme a gate teleportation fidelity better than 99% requires detectors with an efficiency η > 0.999 987.”
From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Glancy et al. 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer
Deutsch, D. (1985) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1985.0070 · Cited by 4,597
Feynman, R. P. (1985) · Optics News · doi:10.1364/on.11.2.000011 · Cited by 1,023
Optical simulation of quantum logic
Cerf, N. J., Adami, C., & Kwiat, P. G. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.r1477 · Cited by 324
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- M. Reck, 1994, Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
- P.G. Kwait, 2000, J. Mod. Opt., 47, 257, 10.1080/09500340008244040 · DOI
- E. Knill, 2001, Nature (London), 409, 46, 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
- S. Takeuchi, 1999, Appl. Phys. Lett., 74, 902, 10.1063/1.123482 · DOI
- T.B. Pittman, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 64, 062311, 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.062311 · DOI · Paper page
- T.C. Ralph, 2001, Phys. Rev. A, 65, 012314, 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.012314 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits
Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135 · Cited by 2,904
Metadata
- Authors
- Glancy, S., LoSecco, J. M., Vasconcelos, H. M., & Tanner, C. E.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2002-06-14
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
