Cited by 346Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Linear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis

Open access
Ralph, T. C., Langford, N. K., Bell, T. B., White, A. G.·2002·Physical Review A

Abstract

We describe the operation and tolerances of a nondeterministic, coincidence basis, quantum controlled-NOT gate for photonic qubits. It is constructed solely from linear optical elements and requires only a two-photon source for its demonstration. Its success probability is $1/9.$

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.65.062324

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The unheralded (post-selected) CNOT gate is a two-photon scheme that requires detection of the two photonic qubits in a computational state to signal success with probability p = 1/9 [35-37].

    “The unheralded (or post-selected) CNOT gate shown in Fig. 2(h) is a two-photon scheme that requires the detection of the two photonic qubits in a computational state to signal the success of the gate with probability p = 1 / 9 [35-37].”

    From Universal linear optics (2015) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 346

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]T. B. Pittman, B. C. Jacobs, J. D. Franson, quant-ph/0109128 (2001). · arXiv
  2. [12]H. F. Hofmann, S. Takeuchi, quant-ph/0111092 (2001). · arXiv

Authors
Ralph, T. C., Langford, N. K., Bell, T. B., & White, A. G.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2002-06-20
Volume
65
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2592048941
Cited by
346
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
13.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
CNOT gate, quantum gates, photonic qubits, linear optical circuits, success probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review