The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Optimal sizes of dielectric microspheres for cavity QED with strong coupling
Open accessAbstract
The whispering gallery modes (WGMs) of quartz microspheres are investigated for the purpose of strong coupling between single photons and atoms in cavity quantum electrodynamics (cavity QED). Within our current understanding of the loss mechanisms of the WGMs, the saturation photon number ${n}_{0}$ and critical atom number ${N}_{0}$ cannot be minimized simultaneously, so that an ``optimal'' sphere size is taken to be the radius for which the geometric mean $\sqrt{{n}_{0}{N}_{0}},$ is minimized. While a general treatment is given for the dimensionless parameters used to characterize the atom-cavity system, detailed consideration is given to the ${D}_{2}$ transition in atomic cesium at ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{0}=852\mathrm{nm}$ using fused-silica microspheres, for which the maximum coupling coefficient ${g}_{a}/(2\ensuremath{\pi})\ensuremath{\approx}750\mathrm{MHz}$ occurs for a sphere radius $a=3.63\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ corresponding to the minimum for ${n}_{0}\ensuremath{\approx}6.06\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}.$ By contrast, the minimum for ${N}_{0}\ensuremath{\approx}9.00\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}6}$ occurs for a sphere radius of $a=8.12\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m},$ while the optimal sphere size for which $\sqrt{{n}_{0}{N}_{0}}$ is minimized occurs at $a=7.83\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}.$ On an experimental front, we have fabricated fused-silica microspheres with radii $a\ensuremath{\sim}10\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}$ and consistently observed quality factors $Q>~0.8\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{7}.$ These results for the WGMs are compared with corresponding parameters achieved in Fabry-Perot cavities to demonstrate the significant potential of microspheres as a tool for cavity QED with strong coupling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vahala, K. J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01939 · Cited by 4,878
Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems
Xiang, Z.-L., Ashhab, S., You, J. Q., & Nori, F. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.623 · Cited by 1,514
Optical resonators with whispering-gallery modes-part II: applications
Ilchenko, V. S., & Matsko, A. B. (2006) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2005.862943 · Cited by 591
Slow Light in Coupled-Resonator-Induced Transparency
Totsuka, K., Kobayashi, N., & Tomita, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.213904 · Cited by 476
Cavity QED with Diamond Nanocrystals and Silica Microspheres
Park, Y.-S., Cook, A. K., & Wang, H. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl061342r · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Buck, J. R., & Kimble, H. J.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2003-03-21
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2039041399
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal sizes of dielectric microspheres for cavity QED with strong coupling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.67.033806
- The paper
- Buck, J. R., & Kimble, H. J. (2003). Optimal sizes of dielectric microspheres for cavity QED with strong coupling. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.67.033806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.