Cited by 609Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum many-body systems

Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations

Open access
Koashi, Masato, Winter, Andreas·2004·Physical Review A

Abstract

It has been observed by numerous authors that a quantum system being entangled with another one limits its possible entanglement with a third system: this has been dubbed the ``monogamous nature of entanglement.'' In this paper we present a simple identity which captures the trade off between entanglement and classical correlation, which can be used to derive rigorous monogamy relations. We also prove various other trade offs of a monogamy nature for other entanglement measures and secret and total correlation measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.69.022309

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strong sub-additivity of entanglement entropy prevents simultaneous maximal entanglement of a system with two other systems.

    “The strong sub-additivity property of the entanglement entropy would prevent simultaneous maximal entanglement of a system with two other systems [210].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koashi, M., & Winter, A.
Affiliations
  • The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2004-02-18
Volume
69
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1657558194
Cited by
609
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 37
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
monogamy of entanglement, quantum entanglement, classical correlations, total correlation, entanglement measures, monogamy inequalities, quantum correlations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review