CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conditional production of superpositions of coherent states with inefficient photon detection

Lund, A. P., Jeong, H., Ralph, T. C., Kim, M. S.·2004·Physical Review A
DOI 10.1103/physreva.70.020101
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.70.020101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is difficult to produce the superposition states required as resources in squeezed or coherent state schemes.

    “The downside is that it is difficult to produce the superposition states that are required as resources in such schemes, although considerable theoretical and experimental progress has been made recently (Lund et al. 2004;Wenger et al. 2004).”

    From Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits (2007) · cites this paper as Lund et al. 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 10.1007/BF01491891 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/BF01491914 · DOI
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022313 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052308 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042305 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1117/12.483016 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042319 · DOI
  8. H. Jeong, 2002, Quantum Inf. Comput., 2, 208, 10.26421/QIC2.3-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.062303 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.2631 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.13 · DOI
  12. R. W. Boyd, 1999, J. Mod. Opt., 46, 367, 10.1080/09500349908231277 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.5261 · DOI
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.55.3184 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4710 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4887 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1126/science.272.5265.1131 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.050402 · DOI
  19. 10.1063/1.123482 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.240401 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lund, A. P., Jeong, H., Ralph, T. C., & Kim, M. S.
Venue
Physical Review A
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Published
2004-08-17
Volume
70
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
DOI
10.1103/physreva.70.020101
Cited by
194
References
1
Language
en
Licence
link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review