Cited by 135Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Average fidelity between random quantum states

Open access
Życzkowski, Karol, Sommers, Hans-Jürgen·2005·Physical Review A

Abstract

We analyze mean fidelity between random density matrices of size $N$, generated with respect to various probability measures in the space of mixed quantum states: the Hilbert-Schmidt measure, the Bures (statistical) measure, the measure induced by the partial trace, and the natural measure on the space of pure states. In certain cases explicit probability distributions for the fidelity are derived. The results obtained may be used to gauge the quality of quantum-information-processing schemes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.71.032313

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the limit of large n, F_n approaches D^{-1}, as may be expected from the average fidelity between random states.

    “In the limit of large n , we see that F n → D -1 , as may be expected from the average fidelity between random states [16].”

    From Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators (2005) · cites this paper as [16]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 135

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]D. J. C. Bures, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 135 , 199 (1969).

Authors
Życzkowski, K., & Sommers, H.-J.
Affiliations
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2005-03-15
Volume
71
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W1982067110
Cited by
135
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
average fidelity, random quantum states, partial trace, mixed quantum states, quantum information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review