Erratum: Relativistic quantum walks [Phys. Rev. A 73, 054302 (2006)]
Open accessAbstract
A factor of ͱ 2 was omitted from the denominator of Eq. ͑7͒; it should read ⌿͑x,t͒ = mN ͑1͒For clarity one could also make the substitution t → in Eqs.͑11͒ and ͑12͒.Neither of these changes affect the figures or conclusions of the paper.In addition, the publisher's information for the second paper in Ref. ͓5͔ was in error.It should be replaced by Ref. ͓1͔.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Convergence of the Dirac QW has been proved in (1+1)-dimensions in [13, 14, 16].
“It has been proved in + (1 1)-dimensions in [13, 14, 16].”
From The Dirac equation as a quantum walk: higher dimensions, observational convergence (2014) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dirac equation as a quantum walk: higher dimensions, observational convergence
Arrighi, P., Nesme, V., & Forets, M. (2014) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical · doi:10.1088/1751-8113/47/46/465302 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Strauch, F. W.
- Corresponding author
- Strauch, Frederick W.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-06-30
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2159108904
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- quantum walks, relativistic quantum mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
