Cited by 279Advanced Frequency and Time StandardsAtomic and Molecular PhysicsAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research

Multipolar theory of blackbody radiation shift of atomic energy levels and its implications for optical lattice clocks

Open access
Porsev, Sergey G., Derevianko, Andrei·2006·Physical Review A

Abstract

Blackbody radiation (BBR) shifts of the $^{3}P_{0}\text{\ensuremath{-}}^{1}S_{0}$ clock transition in the divalent atoms Mg, Ca, Sr, and Yb are evaluated. The dominant electric-dipole contributions are computed using accurate relativistic many-body techniques of atomic structure. At room temperatures, the resulting uncertainties in the $E1$ BBR shifts are large and substantially affect the projected ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}$ fractional accuracy of the optical-lattice-based clocks. A peculiarity of these clocks is that the characteristic BBR wavelength is comparable to the $^{3}P$ fine-structure intervals. To evaluate relevant $M1$ and $E2$ contributions, a theory of multipolar BBR shifts is developed. The resulting corrections, although presently masked by the uncertainties in the $E1$ contribution, are required at the ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}$ accuracy goal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.74.020502

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A conservative upper bound of 1 × 10^-20 is placed on the optical frequency synthesis shift from the switching AOM.

    “Following the analysis of ref. 43, we place a conservative upper bound of 1 × 10 -20 on this source of uncertainty.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 279

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, Proc. Roy. Soc. 223 , 70 (1955).

Authors
Porsev, S. G., & Derevianko, A.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2006-08-30
Volume
74
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2021909579
Cited by
279
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 20
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Keywords
blackbody radiation shift, atomic energy levels, optical lattice clock, clock transition, magnesium, calcium, strontium, ytterbium, fine structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review