Multipolar theory of blackbody radiation shift of atomic energy levels and its implications for optical lattice clocks
Open accessAbstract
Blackbody radiation (BBR) shifts of the $^{3}P_{0}\text{\ensuremath{-}}^{1}S_{0}$ clock transition in the divalent atoms Mg, Ca, Sr, and Yb are evaluated. The dominant electric-dipole contributions are computed using accurate relativistic many-body techniques of atomic structure. At room temperatures, the resulting uncertainties in the $E1$ BBR shifts are large and substantially affect the projected ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}$ fractional accuracy of the optical-lattice-based clocks. A peculiarity of these clocks is that the characteristic BBR wavelength is comparable to the $^{3}P$ fine-structure intervals. To evaluate relevant $M1$ and $E2$ contributions, a theory of multipolar BBR shifts is developed. The resulting corrections, although presently masked by the uncertainties in the $E1$ contribution, are required at the ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}$ accuracy goal.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A conservative upper bound of 1 × 10^-20 is placed on the optical frequency synthesis shift from the switching AOM.
“Following the analysis of ref. 43, we place a conservative upper bound of 1 × 10 -20 on this source of uncertainty.”
From Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level (2018) · cites this paper as [43]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 279
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [15]A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, Proc. Roy. Soc. 223 , 70 (1955).
- Authors
- Porsev, S. G., & Derevianko, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2006-08-30
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2021909579
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Molecular Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research
- Keywords
- blackbody radiation shift, atomic energy levels, optical lattice clock, clock transition, magnesium, calcium, strontium, ytterbium, fine structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review