The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies
Open accessAbstract
Characterization of quantum dynamics is a fundamental problem in quantum physics and quantum-information science. Several methods are known which achieve this goal, namely standard quantum-process tomography (SQPT), ancilla-assisted process tomography, and the recently proposed scheme of direct characterization of quantum dynamics (DCQD). Here, we review these schemes and analyze them with respect to some of the physical resources they require. Although a reliable figure-of-merit for process characterization is not yet available, our analysis can provide a benchmark which is necessary for choosing the scheme that is the most appropriate in a given situation, with given resources. As a result, we conclude that for quantum systems where two-body interactions are not naturally available, SQPT is the most efficient scheme. However, for quantum systems with controllable two-body interactions, the DCQD scheme is more efficient than other known quantum-process tomography schemes in terms of the total number of required elementary quantum operations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states
Braunstein, S. L., & Caves, C. M. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.3439 · Cited by 3,176
Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices
Choi, M.-D. (1975) · Linear Algebra and its Applications · doi:10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0 · Cited by 2,659
Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory
Holevo, A. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-88-7642-378-9 · Cited by 2,582
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.010401 · Cited by 2,440
Linear transformations which preserve trace and positive semidefiniteness of operators
Jamiołkowski, A. (1972) · Reports on Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0034-4877(72)90011-0 · Cited by 1,512
Generalized uncertainty relations: Theory, examples, and Lorentz invariance
Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., & Milburn, G. J. (1996) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.1996.0040 · Cited by 732
Hradil, Z. (1997) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.55.r1561 · Cited by 543
Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators
Emerson, J., Alicki, R., & Życzkowski, K. (2005) · Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/021 · Cited by 502
Quantum Process Tomography of a Controlled-NOT Gate
O'Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., Gilchrist, A., James, D. F. V., Langford, N. K., Ralph, T. C., & White, A. G. (2004) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.080502 · Cited by 499
Cited by
Quantum principal component analysis
Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., & Rebentrost, P. (2014) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3029 · Cited by 1,385
Self-citationError Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits
Temme, K., Bravyi, S., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180509 · Cited by 1,379
Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography
Lvovsky, A. I., & Raymer, M. G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.299 · Cited by 1,123
Quantum advantage in learning from experiments
Huang, H.-Y., Broughton, M., Cotler, J., Chen, S., Li, J., Mohseni, M., Neven, H., Babbush, R., Kueng, R., Preskill, J., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abn7293 · Cited by 519
Self-citationQuantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement
Braun, D., Adesso, G., Benatti, F., Floreanini, R., Marzolino, U., Mitchell, M. W., & Pirandola, S. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035006 · Cited by 434
Metadata
- Authors
- Mohseni, M., Rezakhani, A. T., & Lidar, D. A.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2008-03-13
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W1988974364
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 29.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.77.032322
- The paper
- Mohseni, M., Rezakhani, A. T., & Lidar, D. A. (2008). Quantum-process tomography: Resource analysis of different strategies. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.77.032322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
