Cited by 118Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

Angular momentum of focused beams: Beyond the paraxial approximation

Open access
Monteiro, Paula B., Neto, Paulo A. Maia, Nussenzveig, H. Moysés·2009·Physical Review A

Abstract

We investigate in detail the focusing of a circularly polarized Laguerre-Gaussian laser beam [$\ensuremath{\hbar}\ensuremath{\ell}$ orbital angular momentum per photon; $\ensuremath{\sigma}=1(\ensuremath{-}1)$ for left- (right-) handed polarization] by a high-numerical-aperture objective. The diffraction-limited focused beam has unexpected properties resulting from a strong interplay between the angular spatial structure and the local polarization in the nonparaxial regime. In the region near the beam axis, and provided that $|\ensuremath{\ell}|\ensuremath{\ge}2$ and $\ensuremath{\ell}$ and $\ensuremath{\sigma}$ have opposite signs, the energy locally counterpropagates and the projection of the electric field onto the focal plane counter-rotates with respect to the circular polarization of the incident beam. We explicitly show that the total angular momentum flux per unit power is conserved after focusing, as expected by rotational symmetry, but the spin and orbital separate contributions change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.79.033830

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The SAM-IOAM coupling in nonparaxial optical fields is largely independent of how the field was generated; dipole Rayleigh scattering by a small particle generates a similar conical distribution and spin-to-orbital AM conversion.

    “The SAM- IOAM coupling in nonparaxial optical fields is largely independent of how the field was generated. Instead of high-NA focusing, one can consider dipole Rayleigh scattering by a small particle, which generates a similar conical distribution of the outgoing wavevectors, Fig. 2d.”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [108]

    Section IV (p. 8) identifies an interplay between spin and orbital angular-momentum fluxes in a nonparaxial focused beam. The paper does not establish that this interplay is independent of how the field is generated or discuss a conical distribution produced by dipole Rayleigh scattering. Section IV (p. 9) also explicitly prefers “interplay” to “interconversion” for local angular momentum. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 118

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]E. Wolf, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 253 , 349 (1959).
  2. [7]B. Richards and E. Wolf, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 253 , 358 (1959).
  3. [9]P. A. Maia Neto and H. M. Nussenzveig, Europhys. Lett. 50 , 702 (2000); A. Mazolli, P. A. Maia Neto, and H. M. Nussenzveig, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 459 , 3021 (2003); R. S. Dutra, N. B. Viana, P. A. Maia Neto and H. M. Nussenzveig, J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 9 , S221 (2007).
  4. [16]A. Bekshaev, M. Soskin and M. Vasnetsov, arXiv:0801.2309v1 (2008). · arXiv

Authors
Monteiro, P. B., Neto, P. A. M., & Nussenzveig, H. M.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2009-03-20
Volume
79
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2075084224
Cited by
118
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Keywords
orbital angular momentum, Laguerre-Gaussian beams, circular polarization, high numerical aperture, spin angular momentum, diffraction-limited beam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review