Cited by 110Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry

Duplex symmetry and its relation to the conservation of optical helicity

Barnett, Stephen M., Cameron, Robert P., Yao, Alison M.·2012·Physical Review A

Abstract

Helicity is a familiar concept in particle physics and also appears in the physics of fluids and plasmas. In this paper, we present the optical helicity in a form readily applicable to both quantum and classical problems. We examine the relationship between the optical helicity and the more familiar optical spin and show that the conservation of helicity is an expression of the electric-magnetic symmetry for light. We show that helicity is distinct from Lipkin's 00-zilch; a simple relationship exists between the two only for monochromatic fields. It is only the optical helicity that has the correct dimensions of an angular momentum, thereby accurately describing the helicity of light. To illustrate the physical significance of the optical helicity, we consider a circularly polarized plane wave and the field emitted by a rotating electric dipole.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.86.013845

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physically meaningful properties of the field should respect the Heaviside-Larmor symmetry.

    “It follows that physically meaningful properties of the fi eld should also respect this symmetry [37] and this idea has been useful in deriving forms for the spin and orbital angular momenta of the fi eld [38, 39] and for its helicity [40 -45].”

    From Optical Dirac equation (2014) · cites this paper as [45]

  • The required form of the helicity density within the optical Dirac equation is obtained by defining the helicity operator to be Σ·p/p^2, yielding the familiar expression.

    “which is the familiar expression [40 -45, 78].”

    From Optical Dirac equation (2014) · cites this paper as [45]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 110

Authors
Barnett, S. M., Cameron, R. P., & Yao, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Strathclyde (GB)
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2012-07-30
Volume
86
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2024236339
Cited by
110
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I012451/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Keywords
optical helicity, helicity conservation, angular momentum of light, circularly polarized plane waves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review