The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geometric quantum discord through the Schatten 1-norm
Open accessAbstract
It has recently been pointed out that the geometric quantum discord, as defined by the Hilbert-Schmidt norm (2-norm), is not a good measure of quantum correlations, since it may increase under local reversible operations on the unmeasured subsystem. Here, we revisit the geometric discord by considering general Schatten $p$-norms, explicitly showing that the 1-norm is the only $p$-norm able to define a consistent quantum correlation measure. In addition, by restricting the optimization to the tetrahedron of two-qubit Bell-diagonal states, we provide an analytical expression for the 1-norm geometric discord, which turns out to be equivalent to the negativity of quantumness. We illustrate the measure by analyzing its monotonicity properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 18,842
Quantum Discord: A Measure of the Quantumness of Correlations
Ollivier, H., & Zurek, W. H. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.017901 · Cited by 3,616
Classical, quantum and total correlations
Henderson, L., & Vedral, V (2001) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315 · Cited by 2,367
The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: Discord and related measures
Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T., & Vedral, V. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1655 · Cited by 1,600
Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Nonzero Quantum Discord
Dakić, B., Vedral, V., & Brukner, Č. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.190502 · Cited by 1,203
Quantum discord for two-qubit systems
Luo, S. (2008) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.77.042303 · Cited by 1,060
Quantum discord for two-qubitXstates
Ali, M., Rau, A. R. P., & Alber, G. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.042105 · Cited by 834
Unified View of Quantum and Classical Correlations
Modi, K., Paterek, T., Son, W., Vedral, V., & Williamson, M. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.080501 · Cited by 802
Quantum, classical, and total amount of correlations in a quantum state
Groisman, B., Popescu, S., & Winter, A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.72.032317 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Paula, F. M., de Oliveira, T. R., & Sarandy, M. S.
- Venue
- Physical Review A
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2013-06-07
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- 1050-2947
- 1094-1622
- OpenAlex
- W2011728878
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 36.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geometric quantum discord through the Schatten 1-norm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.87.064101
- The paper
- Paula, F. M., de Oliveira, T. R., & Sarandy, M. S. (2013). Geometric quantum discord through the Schatten 1-norm. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.87.064101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.